首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aircraft >Results from the Second AIAA CFD High-Lift Prediction Workshop Using Edge
【24h】

Results from the Second AIAA CFD High-Lift Prediction Workshop Using Edge

机译:使用Edge的第二届AIAA CFD高空预测研讨会的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The results presented at the Second AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop, using the flow-solver Edge, are summarized for the DLR, German Aerospace Center F11 model. A comparative study of the results, using three turbulence models, is carried out, including the Spalart-Allmaras model, an explicit algebraic Reynolds-stress model, and a curvature correction to the explicit algebraic Reynolds-stress model. The comparisons include a grid-convergence study on a simplified model without slat-and flap-track fairings, and polar calculations including the fairings. The grid-convergence study shows relatively small differences due to different grid resolution and turbulence models, but the differences are larger than those obtained in the first workshop for the NASA trap wing. The prediction has fairly large discrepancies from experimental measurements at low Reynolds numbers for which the computations were carried out assuming fully turbulent flow. The explicit algebraic Reynolds-stress model (with or without curvature correction) tends to exaggerate flow separation and to underpredict the lift, as compared to the experiment. The Spalart-Allmaras model, on the other hand, overpredicts the lift at higher incidences. At the higher Reynolds number, the predictions agree well with the experimental measurements for different turbulence models. The curvature correction to the explicit algebraic Reynolds-stress model has an insignificant effect on the computed results in comparison with the explicit algebraic Reynolds-stress-model predictions.
机译:在第二届AIAA高空预测研讨会上使用流量求解器Edge展示了针对德国航空航天中心F11模型DLR的结果。使用三个湍流模型对结果进行了比较研究,包括Spalart-Allmaras模型,显式代数雷诺应力模型以及对显式代数雷诺应力模型的曲率校正。比较包括对简化模型的网格收敛研究,其中没有板条和襟翼轨道整流罩,以及包括整流罩在内的极坐标计算。网格收敛研究显示,由于不同的网格分辨率和湍流模型,差异相对较小,但差异大于在首次研讨会上获得的NASA诱集机翼的差异。该预测与低雷诺数下的实验测量结果有相当大的差异,为此,在假定完全湍流的情况下进行了计算。与实验相比,显式代数雷诺应力模型(带有或不带有曲率校正)往往会夸大流体分离并低估升力。另一方面,Spalart-Allmaras模型在较高的发生率时高估了升力。在较高的雷诺数下,这些预测与不同湍流模型的实验测量结果非常吻合。与显式代数雷诺应力模型的预测相比,显式代数雷诺应力模型的曲率校正对计算结果的影响不大。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Aircraft》 |2015年第4期|1042-1050|共9页
  • 作者

    Eliasson Peter; Peng Shia-Hui;

  • 作者单位

    Swedish Def Res Agcy, Dept Aeronaut & Syst Technol, SE-16490 Stockholm, Sweden;

    Swedish Def Res Agcy, Dept Aeronaut & Syst Technol, SE-16490 Stockholm, Sweden;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:26:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号