首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the air & waste management association >Fine Particulate Matter Emissions Inventories: Comparisons of Emissions Estimates with Observations from Recent Field Programs
【24h】

Fine Particulate Matter Emissions Inventories: Comparisons of Emissions Estimates with Observations from Recent Field Programs

机译:精细的颗粒物排放清单:排放估算与最近实地计划观测值的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Emissions inventories of fine particulate matter (PM_(2.5)) were compared with estimates of emissions based on data emerging from U.S. Environment Protection Agency Particulate Matter Supersites and other field programs. Six source categories for PM_(2.5) emissions were reviewed: on-road mobile sources, nonroad mobile sources, cooking, biomass combustion, fugitive dust, and stationary sources. Ammonia emissions from all of the source categories were also examined. Regional emissions inventories of PM in the exhaust from on-road and nonroad sources were generally consistent with ambient observations, though uncertainties in some emission factors were twice as large as the emission factors. In contrast, emissions inventories of road dust were up to an order of magnitude larger than ambient observations, and estimated brake wear and tire dust emissions were half as large as ambient observations in urban areas. Although comprehensive nationwide emissions inventories of PM_(2.5) from cooking sources and biomass burning are not yet available, observational data in urban areas suggest that cooking sources account for approximately 5-20% of total primary emissions (excluding dust), and biomass burning sources are highly dependent on region. Finally, relatively few observational data were available to assess the accuracy of emission estimates for stationary sources. Overall, the uncertainties in primary emissions for PM_(2.5) are substantial. Similar uncertainties exist for ammonia emissions. Because of these uncertainties, the design of PM_(2.5) control strategies should be based on inventories that have been refined by a combination of bottom-up and top-down methods.
机译:将细颗粒物(PM_(2.5))的排放清单与排放估算值进行了比较,这些估算值是根据美国环境保护局微粒物质超级站点和其他现场计划得出的数据得出的。审查了PM_(2.5)排放的六种来源类别:道路移动来源,非道路移动来源,烹饪,生物质燃烧,逃逸性粉尘和固定来源。还检查了所有来源类别的氨气排放。尽管某些排放因子的不确定性是排放因子的两倍,但道路和非道路排放源的尾气中PM的区域排放清单通常与环境观测结果一致。相比之下,道路尘埃排放清单的排放量要比周围环境观测值大一个数量级,估计的制动器磨损和轮胎尘埃排放量是城市地区环境观测值的一半。尽管尚无法获得全国范围内从烹饪源和生物质燃烧产生的PM_(2.5)的全面排放清单,但城市地区的观察数据表明,烹饪源约占一次排放总量(粉尘除外)的5-20%,而生物质燃烧源高度依赖地区。最后,相对较少的观测数据可用于评估固定源排放估算的准确性。总体而言,PM_(2.5)一次排放的不确定性很大。氨气排放存在类似的不确定性。由于存在这些不确定性,因此PM_(2.5)控制策略的设计应基于通过自下而上和自上而下的方法相结合完善的清单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号