...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the air & waste management association >Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?
【24h】

Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?

机译:每日死亡率是否与细颗粒特别相关?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dear Editor, While recently reviewing a manuscript, I was led back to read a 1996 JA&WMA paper entitled, "Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?" (Schwartz et al., 1996). This 19-year-old paper is iconic in the sense it is one of the first papers to apply sophisticated statistical techniques, leading to additional research by the same authors' team (and other groups) that influenced the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines, for particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter (AD) nominally less than 2.5 μm (PM_(2.5)) (Laden et al., 2000; Schwartz, 2000; Schwartz, 2003; Zanobetti and Schwartz, 2005; Franklin et al., 2007; Schwartz et al., 2008; Zanobetti et al., 2014). However, I found it had some problematic areas that propagated, but if they are resolved, could further strengthen the team's conclusions and give stronger support to the upcoming review of the current EPA PM_(2.5) NAAQS.
机译:亲爱的编辑,在最近审阅稿件时,我被带回阅读了1996年JA&WMA的一篇论文,“每天的死亡率是否与细颗粒有关?” (Schwartz等人,1996)。这份已有19年历史的论文具有标志意义,因为它是第一批应用复杂的统计技术的论文,导致同一作者团队(和其他小组)进行了其他研究,这些研究影响了当前的美国环境保护署(EPA) )国家空气质量标准(NAAQS)和世界卫生组织(WHO)指南,空气动力学直径(AD)标称小于2.5μm(PM_(2.5))的颗粒物(PM)(Laden et al。,2000; Schwartz,2000; Schwartz,2003; Zanobetti and Schwartz,2005; Franklin等,2007; Schwartz等,2008; Zanobetti等,2014)。但是,我发现它传播了一些问题,但是如果解决了这些问题,则可以进一步加强研究小组的结论,并为即将进行的当前EPA PM_(2.5)NAAQS审查提供更强有力的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号