...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting and public policy >An analysis of the maturity and strategic impact of investments in ERM
【24h】

An analysis of the maturity and strategic impact of investments in ERM

机译:企业风险管理投资的成熟度和战略影响分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past decade, expectations for more effective oversight of risks by boards of directors have significantly increased. These expectations emanate from stock exchanges, regulators, credit rating agencies and other key stakeholders. Proponents of enhanced risk oversight argue that an increased understanding of enterprise-wide risks provides strategic benefit by helping the board and management identify and manage risks that may impact the achievement of strategic objectives while at the same time helping the board monitor the extent of risk-taking on the part of management in their desire to meet these objectives. In response to these growing expectations, some boards have asked management to explore implementation of a more holistic, top-down approach to risk oversight widely known as enterprise risk management (ERM) while others have not. Institutional theory would suggest that a number of organizations implement minimal elements of ERM for symbolic reasons, lacking substance in risk oversight. In contrast, agency theory would suggest that boards embrace explicit and robust risk oversight activities to monitor management's risk-taking actions, and resource dependence theory would suggest that they also do so to help the organization achieve strategic objectives. Little is known about the way in which boards and management organize their processes and the impact of those processes on the level of ERM adoption. More importantly, little is known about the extent to which ERM is perceived to provide strategic benefit to those organizations that have invested in developing a robust ERM process. Based on data gathered from 645 survey responses from executives of organizations spanning a number of industries and sizes, we find that organizations with greater ERM maturity are significantly more likely to have taken steps to formally engage the board and senior management in specific risk oversight tasks (consistent with agency theory), and certain board and management risk practices are associated with perceptions that ERM provides strategic advantage (consistent with resource dependence theory). (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在过去的十年中,对董事会更有效地监督风险的期望大大提高了。这些期望来自证券交易所,监管机构,信用评级机构和其他主要利益相关者。支持风险监督的人认为,通过帮助董事会和管理层识别和管理可能影响战略目标实现的风险,同时帮助董事会监控风险的程度,对企业范围风险的加深了解可以提供战略利益。满足他们实现这些目标的愿望。为了响应这些日益增长的期望,一些董事会要求管理层探索实施更全面,自上而下的风险监管方法,即企业风险管理(ERM),而另一些则没有。制度理论认为,许多组织出于象征性原因而只采用了最小限度的企业风险管理要素,缺乏实质性的风险监督。相比之下,代理理论将建议董事会开展明确而稳健的风险监督活动,以监控管理层的冒险行为,而资源依赖理论将建议董事会也这样做,以帮助组织实现战略目标。关于董事会和管理层组织流程的方式以及这些流程对ERM采用水平的影响知之甚少。更重要的是,人们几乎不了解企业风险管理在多大程度上为那些已投资开发强大的企业风险管理流程的组织提供战略利益。根据从来自多个行业和规模的组织的高管的645个调查答复中收集的数据,我们发现,企业风险管理成熟度较高的组织更有可能采取措施正式让董事会和高级管理层参与特定的风险监督任务( (与代理理论相一致),并且某些董事会和管理风险实践与ERM提供战略优势的看法相关(与资源依赖理论相一致)。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of accounting and public policy 》 |2015年第3期| 219-243| 共25页
  • 作者单位

    N Carolina State Univ, Poole Coll Management, Dept Accounting, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA;

    N Carolina State Univ, Poole Coll Management, Dept Accounting, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA;

    N Carolina State Univ, Poole Coll Management, Dept Accounting, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号