...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting & economics >Loan loss accounting and procyclical bank lending: The role of direct regulatory actions
【24h】

Loan loss accounting and procyclical bank lending: The role of direct regulatory actions

机译:贷款损失会计和顺周期银行贷款:直接监管行动的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I provide evidence that loan loss accounting affects procyclical lending through its impact on regulatory actions. Regulators are more likely to place banks with inadequate loan loss allowances under enforcement actions that restrict lending, leading these banks to lend less during downturns. Further, I find that banks with lower regulatory ratings lend less when they have more timely provisions, consistent with research theorizing that timely provisions increase transparency and inhibit regulatory forbearance. This regulatory action mechanism expands on prior research that has focused on the effect of loan loss recognition on regulatory capital adequacy during economic downturns. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我提供的证据表明,贷款损失会计通过影响监管行为而影响了顺周期贷款。监管者更有可能将贷款损失准备金不足的银行置于限制贷款的执法行动之下,导致这些银行在经济低迷时期减少贷款。此外,我发现监管评级较低的银行在拥有更多及时准备金时放贷较少,这与研究理论认为及时准备金增加了透明度并抑制了监管宽容相一致。这种监管行动机制是对先前研究的扩展,该研究的重点是在经济衰退期间确认贷款损失对监管资本充足率的影响。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号