首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Cognitive Diversity in the Global Academy:Why the Voices of Persons with Cognitive Disabilities are Vital to Intellectual Diversity
【24h】

Cognitive Diversity in the Global Academy:Why the Voices of Persons with Cognitive Disabilities are Vital to Intellectual Diversity

机译:全球学院的认知多样性:为什么认知障碍者的声音对智力多样性至关重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In asking scholars to reflect on the "structures and practices of academic knowledge that render alternative knowledge traditions irrelevant and invisible," as well as on the ways these must change for the academy to cease "functioning as an instrument of westernization rather than as an authentically global and diverse intellectual commons," the editor of this special issue of the Journal of Academic Ethics is envisaging a world much needed and much resisted. A great deal of the conversation about diversity in higher education emphasizes, rightly, the need for an international and ethnically diverse population of scholars and students. Less attention is paid to the value of cognitive diversity-the diversity of cognition generated by cognitive disabilities. As one aspect of intellectual diversity, cognitive diversity promises novel ways of thinking and new understandings of what knowledge is, who makes it, and how it is made. The unique value of cognitive diversity is its insistence on a radical shift in our conception of who can know and who can produce knowledge. Insisting on the inclusion, as scholars, of persons with minds labelled disabled, an epistemology of disability pushes us to reform the much criticized but still dominant notion of the expert and scholar as able-bodied and hyper-rational.
机译:在要求学者们反思“使另类知识传统变得不相关和不可见的学术知识的结构和实践”,以及反思这些变化以使学院停止“为西方化而不是真正地发挥作用”的方式时,全球性和多样化的知识共享”,《学术伦理杂志》这一期特刊的编辑正在设想一个急需和抵制的世界。关于高等教育多样性的大量讨论正确地强调了对国际和种族多样化的学者和学生群体的需求。认知多样性的价值受到了较少的关注,认知多样性是由认知障碍产生的。作为智力多样性的一个方面,认知多样性为人们提供了新颖的思维方式和对知识是什么,由谁制造以及如何制造的新认识。认知多样性的独特价值在于它坚持我们对谁可以知道和谁可以产生知识的观念的根本转变。坚持以学者的身份将那些被标记为残疾人的人包括在内,关于残疾的认识论促使我们改革专家和学者广受批评但仍占主导地位的健全和超理性的观念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号