...
首页> 外文期刊>The joint commission journal on quality and patient safety >We Have Newton on a Retainer: Reductionism When We Need Systems Thinking
【24h】

We Have Newton on a Retainer: Reductionism When We Need Systems Thinking

机译:牛顿在保持器上:需要系统思考时的还原论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Something must have gone terribly wrong when a 16-year-old patient died after a nurse accidentally administered a bag of epidural analgesia by the intravenous route instead of the intended penicillin. What was it? We typically want to find the broken parts, fix them, remove them, and make sure that they can't contribute to failure again. The root cause analysis (RCA) described by Smetzer et al. in this issue of the Journal does precisely that. As a starting point, the RCA identified four proximate causes of the error: (1) availability of an epidural medication in the patient's room before it was prescribed or needed, (2) selection of the wrong medication from a table, (3) failure to place an identification band on the patient, which was required to utilize a point-of-care bar-coding system, and (4) failure to employ available bar-coding technology to verify the drug before administration.
机译:当一名16岁的患者在一名护士意外地通过静脉途径而非预期的青霉素途径施予一袋硬膜外镇痛剂后死亡时,一定发生了严重错误。它以前如何?我们通常希望找到损坏的零件,对其进行修复,然后将其卸下,并确保它们不会再次导致故障。 Smetzer等人描述的根本原因分析(RCA)。 《华尔街日报》这一期恰恰做到了这一点。首先,RCA确定了导致错误的四个主要原因:(1)在开处方或需要之前在患者房间内使用硬膜外药物;(2)从表中选择错误的药物;(3)失败在患者身上放置一个识别带,这需要使用即时医疗条形码系统,并且(4)在使用之前无法使用可用的条形码技术来验证药物。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Sidney W.A. Dekker;

  • 作者单位

    Leonardo da Vinci Laboratory for Complexity and Systems Thinking, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号