首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Religion >Toward an Alternative Evolutionary Theory of Religion: Looking Past Computational Evolutionary Psychology to a Wider Field of Possibilities
【24h】

Toward an Alternative Evolutionary Theory of Religion: Looking Past Computational Evolutionary Psychology to a Wider Field of Possibilities

机译:朝着另一种宗教进化论迈进:将过去的计算进化心理学看向更广阔的可能性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cognitive science of the last half-century has been dominated by thencomputational theory of mind and its picture of thought as informationnprocessing. Taking this picture for granted, the most prominent evol-nutionary theories of religion of the last fifteen years have sought to under-nstand human religiosity as the product or by-product of universalninformation processing mechanisms that were adaptive in our ancestralnenvironment. The rigidity of such explanations is at odds with the highlyncontext-sensitive nature of historical studies of religion, and thus contrib-nutes to the apparent tug-of-war between scientific and humanistic per-nspectives. This essay argues that this antagonism stems in part from andeep flaw of computational theory, namely its notion of information asnpre-given and context-free. In contrast, non-computational theories thatnpicture mind as an adaptive, interactive process in which information isnjointly constructed by organism and environment offer an alternativenapproach to an evolutionary understanding of human religiosity, onenthat is compatible with historical studies and amenable to a wide range ofninquiries, including some limited kinds of theological inquiry.
机译:后半个世纪的认知科学一直被当时的计算心智理论及其作为信息处理的思想图景所支配。认为这张照片是理所当然的,过去十五年来最著名的宗教进化论理论试图将人类宗教理解为适应我们祖先环境的通用信息处理机制的产物或副产物。这种解释的僵化与对宗教历史研究的高度上下文敏感的性质背道而驰,因此对科学和人文观点之间明显的拉锯战做出了贡献。本文认为,这种对抗性部分源于计算理论的深层缺陷,即它的信息概念既定又无上下文。相比之下,非计算理论将思维描绘为一种适应性的,互动的过程,在该过程中,信息是由有机体和环境共同构建的,为人类对宗教信仰的进化理解提供了另一种途径,这种观点与历史研究兼容并适合于广泛的询问,包括一些有限的神学探究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of the American Academy of Religion》 |2010年第3期|p.583-621|共39页
  • 作者

    Nathaniel F. Barrett;

  • 作者单位

    *Nathaniel F. Barrett, Institute for the Biocultural Study of Religion, 1711 Massachusetts AveNW #308, Washington, DC 20036, USA. E-mail: nbarrett@ibcsr.org. I would like to thank thereviewers, Wesley J. Wildman, and Robert C. Neville for their comments on drafts of this paper.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号