首页> 外文期刊>JNCI Monographs >Factors in Quality Care—The Case of Follow-Up to Abnormal Cancer Screening Tests—Problems in the Steps and Interfaces of Care
【24h】

Factors in Quality Care—The Case of Follow-Up to Abnormal Cancer Screening Tests—Problems in the Steps and Interfaces of Care

机译:优质护理中的因素-癌症筛查检查异常的随访情况-护理的步骤和界面中的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To achieve the benefit of cancer screening, appropriate follow-up of abnormal screening test results must occur. Such follow-up requires traversing the transition between screening detection and diagnosis, including several steps and interfaces in care. This article reviews factors and interventions associated with follow-up of abnormal tests for cervical, breast and colorectal cancers. We synthesized 12 reviews of descriptive and intervention studies published between 1980 and 2008. There was wide variability in definition of follow-up, setting, study population, and reported prevalence rates. Correlates of follow-up included patient characteristics (eg, knowledge and age), social support, provider characteristics, practice (eg, having reminders systems), community and professional norms (eg, quality measures), and policy (eg, federal programs). Effective interventions included patient education and support; delivery systems design changes, such as navigation; and information system changes, most notably patient tracking and physician reminders. Few studies focused explicitly on interfaces and steps of care, such as communication between primary care and specialists, or simultaneously targeted the multilevel factors that affect care. Future practice and research priorities should include development of clear operational definitions of the steps and interfaces related to patients, providers, and organizations; reflect evolving guidelines and new technologies; determine priorities for intervention testing; and improve measures and apply appropriate study designs.
机译:为了获得癌症筛查的好处,必须对异常筛查结果进行适当的随访。这种随访需要遍历筛查检测和诊断之间的过渡,包括护理中的几个步骤和接口。本文回顾了宫颈癌,乳腺癌和结直肠癌异常检查随访的相关因素和干预措施。我们综合了1980年至2008年间发表的12篇描述性研究和干预性研究的综述。随访的定义,研究环境,研究人群和报告的患病率存在​​很大差异。随访的相关性包括患者特征(例如知识和年龄),社会支持,提供者特征,实践(例如具有提醒系统),社区和专业规范(例如质量措施)以及政策(例如联邦计划) 。有效的干预措施包括患者教育和支持;交付系统设计更改,例如导航;和信息系统的变化,最值得注意的是患者跟踪和医生提醒。很少有研究明确关注护理的接口和步骤,例如初级护理与专家之间的沟通,或同时针对影响护理的多层次因素。未来的实践和研究重点应包括为与患者,提供者和组织有关的步骤和接口制定清晰的操作定义;反映不断发展的指南和新技术;确定干预测试的重点;并改进措施并应用适当的研究设计。

著录项

  • 来源
    《JNCI Monographs》 |2010年第40期|p.58-71|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Affiliations of authors: Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (JZ);

    Applied Cancer Screening Research Branch and Applied Cancer Screening Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (ST), and Health Services and Economics Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (RY), National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD;

    Clinical Monitoring Research Program, SAIC-Frederick, Inc, National Cancer Institute, Fredrick, MD (RAP);

    Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA (CC);

    Affiliations of authors: Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (JZ);

    Applied Cancer Screening Research Branch and Applied Cancer Screening Branch, Division of Cancer Cont;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号