首页> 外文期刊>Issues in Science and Technology >Reforming medical liability
【24h】

Reforming medical liability

机译:改革医疗责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Frank Sloan and Lindsey Chepke are to be commended for calling attention to fundamental problems in Americas medical liability system ("From Medical Malpractice to Quality Assurance," Issues, Spring 2008). The existing system compensates few patients who have been injured, its deterrent effect is limited, its administrative costs are very high, and it does little to improve patient safety. And, as they point out, the types of medical liability reforms that traditionally have generated political traction, including caps on noneconomic damages, do little to address these shortcomings.rnOf course, these problems are not new, and a variety of both incremental and far-reaching reform proposals to address them have been advanced through the years by political leaders, academics, policy advocates, and interest groups. Among these, the nonprofit organization Common Good (of which this author is general counsel) has been active in promoting the concept of developing administrative health courts, with specialized judges, independent expert witnesses, and predictable damage awards. In many ways, the health
机译:弗兰克·斯隆(Frank Sloan)和林赛·切普克(Lindsey Chepke)引起了人们对美洲医疗责任体系基本问题的关注(在“从医疗事故到质量保证,”问题,2008年春季)中,受到赞扬。现有的系统很少补偿受伤的患者,其威慑作用有限,管理成本很高,并且几乎没有改善患者的安全性。而且,正如他们指出的那样,传统上引起政治关注的医疗责任改革类型,包括非经济损失的上限,对于解决这些缺陷几乎没有作用。rn当然,这些问题并不是新出现的,并且有各种各样的渐进式的和遥远的多年来,政治领导人,学者,政策倡导者和利益集团提出了解决这些问题的改革建议。在这些机构中,非营利组织“公益事业”(作者为总法律顾问)一直在积极倡导发展行政卫生法院的理念,并设有专业法官,独立专家证人和可预见的赔偿金。在很多方面,健康

著录项

  • 来源
    《Issues in Science and Technology》 |2008年第4期|16|共1页
  • 作者

    PAUL BARRINGER;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:52:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号