首页> 外文期刊>Irish Political Studies >'Unionist Derry is Ulster's Panama': The Northern Ireland Labour Party and the Civil Rights Issue
【24h】

'Unionist Derry is Ulster's Panama': The Northern Ireland Labour Party and the Civil Rights Issue

机译:“统一党的德里是阿尔斯特的巴拿马”:北爱尔兰工党与民权问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Debates over the nature, significance and legacy of the Northern Ireland civil rights movement tend to stress its Catholic and irredentist character. This article takes a different approach by examining the role of those activists from a Protestant and socialist background who played important roles in agitating for redress of socio-economic and political grievances. In particular, the article focuses on the involvement of individual members of the bi-confessional Northern Ireland Labour Party (NILP) in the civil rights movement in the 1960s. It considers the NILP's relationship to other civil rights bodies, such as the Campaign for Social Justice and the Campaign for Democracy in Ulster, and asks how its approach differed. Drawing on extensive empirical research - including previously untapped archival sources and oral histories - the article also sets out to challenge the orthodox public and academic interpretation of the civil rights movement as ostensibly anti-partitionist in political orientation or devoid of significant Protestant and socialist participation. The central argument is that the NILP remained ill-equipped to become the political vanguard of the radical street politics, not because it was tethered to a narrow non-sectarian agenda but because it was deeply wedded to the process and fundamentals of British parliamentary democracy. Unionists will assert that they cannot, in any circumstances, afford the blow to their prestige of losing control of Derry - in short, 'the end justifies the means'. Unionist Derry is Ulster's Panama. (Senior NILP Strategist Charles Brett, The Guardian, 4 March 1964)
机译:关于北爱尔兰民权运动的性质,重要性和遗产的争论倾向于强调其天主教和煽动主义的特征。本文通过考察那些来自新教和社会主义背景的激进主义者的作用,采取了不同的方法,这些激进主义者在鼓动社会经济和政治不满方面起着重要作用。特别是,本文着重介绍了北爱尔兰两党工党(NILP)的个人成员在1960年代的民权运动中的参与。它考虑了NILP与其他民权机构的关系,例如“社会正义运动”和“阿尔斯特民主运动”,并询问其方法有何不同。文章利用广泛的实证研究-包括以前未开发的档案资料和口述历史-还提出质疑民权运动的正统公众和学术解释,这些人表面上是政治取向的反分区主义者,或者缺乏新教徒和社会主义者的参与。中心论点是,NILP仍然没有足够的能力成为激进街头政治的政治先锋,这不是因为它被束缚于狭窄的非宗派议程,而是因为它已深深地与英国议会民主制的进程和基本面紧密结合。工会主义者会断言,他们在任何情况下都无法承受失去对德里的控制权的威望-简而言之,“结果证明手段是正当的”。工会主义者Derry是Ulster的巴拿马。 (NILP高级策略师Charles Brett,《卫报》,1964年3月4日)

著录项

  • 来源
    《Irish Political Studies》 |2008年第3期|363-385|共23页
  • 作者

    Aaron Edwards;

  • 作者单位

    Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号