首页> 外文期刊>Interventions >CONNOLLY, THE ARCHIVE, AND METHOD
【24h】

CONNOLLY, THE ARCHIVE, AND METHOD

机译:一直以来,档案和方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Over the last two decades, the introduction of postcolonial theory into the context of Irish Studies has led to a prolonged re-examination of a number of thinkers whose works resonate with recent critical understandings of the history of colonization in Ireland and the nationalist drive for independence. This has intensified interest in archival research to reclaim these figures and texts for purposes of contemporary criticism. One of the most significant of these thinkers is the anti-imperialist revolutionary leader James Connolly, perhaps the first theorist to rethink Marxism according to the specificity of colonial history. Connolly's theorization of the impact the violence of imperialism makes upon Marxist understandings of the dialectical category of contradiction contributes to the critical interrogation of modernization in diachronic terms. The degree to which Connolly insisted upon the specificity of the time in which he wrote, however, makes it more difficult to translate his positions into contemporary terms that would enable a critique of the recent moment of Irish neoliberalism known as the Celtic Tiger. This article argues that Connolly's importance to synchronic analysis lies precisely in his own relation to the archive. On the one hand, Connolly's writing provides a vital theoretical rationale for the logic of archival reclamation, often undertheorized or taken for granted in contemporary Irish Studies. On the other hand, his understanding of the archive makes it possible to account for a persistent repertoire of Irish subaltern practices challenging a more conservative or revisionist conception of the archive.
机译:在过去的二十年中,后殖民理论在爱尔兰研究中的应用导致对许多思想家的重新审查,这些思想家的作品与最近对爱尔兰殖民历史和民族主义争取独立的批判性理解产生共鸣。出于当代批评的目的,这引起了人们对档案研究的兴趣,以回收这些数字和文字。这些思想家中最重要的思想家之一就是反帝国主义革命领袖詹姆斯·康诺利,他也许是最早根据殖民历史的特殊性重新思考马克思主义的理论家。康诺利关于帝国主义暴力对马克思主义对矛盾的辩证范畴的理解的影响的理论化,促成了对历时性的批判性批判。然而,康诺利在一定程度上坚持他所写时间的特殊性,这使得将他的立场转化为当代术语变得更加困难,这将使人们对最近被称为凯尔特虎的爱尔兰新自由主义时代进行批评。本文认为,康诺利对共时分析的重要性恰恰在于他与档案馆的关系。一方面,康诺利(Connolly)的著作为档案开垦的逻辑提供了重要的理论依据,而档案开垦的逻辑在当代爱尔兰研究中常常被低估或理所当然。另一方面,他对档案馆的理解使得有可能解释爱尔兰次要做法的持久性,这挑战了档案馆的保守性或修正主义观念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号