...
首页> 外文期刊>International Urogynecology Journal >Urinary tract injury: medical negligence or unavoidable complication?
【24h】

Urinary tract injury: medical negligence or unavoidable complication?

机译:尿路损伤:医疗过失或不可避免的并发症?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The incidence of urinary tract injury is low in most gynaecological operations but, if undiagnosed, is a cause of significant postoperative morbidity for the patient and litigation for the gynaecologist. A Medline search of studies of urinary tract injury at gynaecological surgery show that only one in 10 ureteral injuries and one in three bladder injuries are detected at the time of surgery without intra-operative cystoscopy. As cystoscopy is not routinely performed by the majority of gynaecologists during surgery, even in difficult cases, failure to detect injury to the urinary tract by itself should not be seen as negligence. However, all gynaecologists performing pelvic surgery should be encouraged to become competent in cystourethroscopy and perform this intra-operatively, at least in all high-risk cases of gynaecological surgery.
机译:在大多数妇科手术中,尿路损伤的发生率很低,但是,如果不确诊,则是导致患者术后严重发病以及引起妇科医生诉讼的重要原因。在Medline中对妇科手术中的尿路损伤进行的研究表明,在不进行术中膀胱镜检查的情况下,手术时仅检测到十分之一的输尿管损伤和三分之一的膀胱损伤。由于大多数妇科医生在手术过程中通常不会进行膀胱镜检查,即使在困难的情况下,也不能将未能单独检测到尿路损伤的情况视为疏忽大意。但是,至少在所有高危妇科手术病例中,应鼓励所有进行骨盆手术的妇科医师胜任膀胱镜检查,并在术中进行此项操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号