...
首页> 外文期刊>International tax and public finance >Taxation and foreign direct investment (FDI): empirical evidence from a quasi-experiment in China
【24h】

Taxation and foreign direct investment (FDI): empirical evidence from a quasi-experiment in China

机译:税收与​​外国直接投资(FDI):来自中国准实验的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

China's new Corporate Income Tax Law was passed in March 2007 and took effect on January 1 2008. It terminates the dual corporate income tax regime by removing the preferential tax treatments offered to foreign investment enterprises (FIEs) and unifies the corporate income tax regime for FIEs and Chinese domestic enterprises (DEs). This paper uses a difference-in-differences approach to determine whether FIEs are responding to the law by reducing their investment in China. Employing the Chinese Industrial Enterprises Database (2002~2008) to implement the analysis, we find that: (1) FIEs are responding to the law by reducing their investment in China; and (2) the magnitude of the response is larger for HongKong-Macau-Taiwan (HMT) investment enterprises than that for other FIEs, which supports the claim that some Chinese investors engaged in "roundtripping" FDI. Our confidence in the conclusions are further boosted by the results of a series of placebo tests and two robustness checks: (1) the results of the placebo tests support the claim that the estimated effect is due to the tax reform rather than to other confounding factors; (2) the results of the first robustness check are consistent with the perception that State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) might enjoy more favorable treatments from the Chinese government than Private-Owned Enterprises (POEs); and (3) the results of the second robustness check show that incorporating enterprise-specific time trends into the baseline specification of our econometric models does not change the conclusions.
机译:中国新的《企业所得税法》于2007年3月通过,并于2008年1月1日生效。该法通过取消对外商投资企业(FIE)的优惠税收待遇,终止了双重企业所得税制度,并统一了FIE的企业所得税制度。和中国国内企业(DEs)。本文使用差异法来确定外商投资企业是否通过减少在华投资来响应法律。利用中国工业企业数据库(2002〜2008)进行分析,我们发现:(1)外商投资企业是通过减少在华投资来响应法律的; (2)港澳台投资企业的反应幅度大于其他外商投资企业,这支持了一些中国投资者进行“往返”外国直接投资的说法。一系列安慰剂测试和两项稳健性检查的结果进一步增强了我们对结论的信心:(1)安慰剂测试的结果支持这样一种说法,即估计的效果是由于税收改革而不是其他混杂因素造成的; (2)首次健壮性检查的结果与以下看法一致:国有企业(SOE)可能比私营企业(POE)受到中国政府的更优惠待遇; (3)第二次健壮性检查的结果表明,将企业特定的时间趋势纳入我们的计量经济学模型的基准规范中不会改变结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号