...
首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Economics >Financial innovation: theoretical issues and empirical evidence in Italy and in the UK
【24h】

Financial innovation: theoretical issues and empirical evidence in Italy and in the UK

机译:金融创新:意大利和英国的理论问题和经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the first part of the paper, we try to clearly identify financial innovations and draw a general framework. Despite the relevance of financial innovations, a unique definition is difficult to find. We then provide empirical evidence of such innovations on a sample of Italian and UK listed banks over the period 2005–2007 using financial account data. First, the absence of any mention of a specific organizational unit in charge of research and development (R&D) is highlighted. However, the existence of a research and developmental function involving different organizational units cannot be excluded. Second, innovation seems to be mainly concentrated in the product area, both in Italy and in the UK. This could be accounted for by the difference in the “life cycles” of innovations and by the different operational conditions of banks in both systems. Third, larger banks seem more innovative, both in Italy and in the UK. No clear relation between innovation and cost reduction/revenue increase seems to exist, at least in Italy. In the light of the above considerations, policy implication comes to light on whether the choice of not establishing a specific organizational unit dedicated to R&D could turn out effective in the medium-long term.
机译:在本文的第一部分中,我们尝试明确识别金融创新并绘制一个总体框架。尽管金融创新意义重大,但很难找到一个独特的定义。然后,我们使用金融帐户数据,在2005-2007年期间的意大利和英国上市银行的样本中提供此类创新的经验证据。首先,强调没有提及负责研发的特定组织单位。但是,不能排除存在涉及不同组织单位的研究和开发职能。其次,创新似乎主要集中在意大利和英国的产品领域。这可能是由于创新的“生命周期”不同以及两个系统中银行的运营状况不同所造成的。第三,在意大利和英国,大型银行似乎更具创新性。至少在意大利,创新与降低成本/增加收入之间似乎不存在明确的关系。鉴于以上考虑,政策含义就在于是否选择不建立专门负责研发的特定组织单位在中长期来看是否有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号