首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Economics and Finance >Corporate credit ratings: Selection on size or productivity?
【24h】

Corporate credit ratings: Selection on size or productivity?

机译:企业信用等级:选择规模还是生产力?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Productivity growth is largely driven by the reallocation of resources from less productive firms to more productive ones. Whether corporate credit ratings function in a supportive role is, however, unknown. I use a panel of US manufacturing firms matched to their S&P ratings over the years 1980 to 2009 to investigate. Overall, I find that a typical investment-grade firm is either medium sized and very productive or very large and relatively unproductive. As per evidence, the role of the credit rating system can be best described as disruptive to the reallocation process. These findings are robust to various specification tests and do not seem to be specific to the recent history; the practice only came under spotlight in the recent decade.
机译:生产力的增长很大程度上是由资源从生产率较低的公司重新分配到生产率较高的公司的驱动。但是,公司信用评级是否起到辅助作用尚不清楚。我使用一组与1980到2009年间标准普尔评级相匹配的美国制造业公司进行调查。总的来说,我发现一个典型的投资级公司要么是中等规模的,生产力很高,要么是规模很大,相对没有生产力。根据证据,最好将信用评级系统的作用描述为对重新分配过程的破坏。这些发现对各种规格测试都是可靠的,并且似乎并非特定于近期历史。这种做法直到最近十年才受到关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号