首页> 外文期刊>Review of International Political Economy >Platform lending and the politics of financial infrastructures
【24h】

Platform lending and the politics of financial infrastructures

机译:平台借贷与金融基础设施的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Online platform lending is typically understood as a challenge to incumbent banking institutions. Since its inception platform lending has been closely associated with particular financial and digital technological innovations that are thought to be changing how people engage in lending and borrowing around the world. In this article, I emphasize the deeply political aspect of these innovations. I claim that the platform lending model is built on the ostensible 'infrastructural quality' of credit providers across a number of national contexts. This helps explain why platform lending has emerged in its current form and why the firms involved tend to have a certain attachment to and association with the perceived merits of financial inclusion policy initiatives. The article further seeks to show that this infrastructural quality is politically contestable. When the politics of claims to infrastructure are taken seriously it is possible to demonstrate how platform lending, in spite of the 'alternative' and 'democratizing' discourses that surround the sector, is in fact built upon a particular set of political state and business-led agendas that essentially further entrench widespread dependence on debt.
机译:在线平台贷款通常被理解为对现有银行机构的挑战。自平台成立以来,贷款就一直与特定的金融和数字技术创新紧密相关,这些创新被认为正在改变人们在世界范围内从事贷款和借款的方式。在本文中,我强调了这些创新的深层政治意义。我声称,平台借贷模型是建立在许多国家背景下表面上信用提供者的“基础设施质量”之上的。这有助于解释为什么平台借贷以目前的形式出现,以及为什么所涉及的公司倾向于对金融普惠政策举措的优缺点有一定的依恋和联想。该文章进一步试图表明这种基础设施的质量在政治上是可以竞争的。当认真对待对基础设施的要求的政治时,有可能展示出平台贷款,尽管围绕该行业的“另类”和“民主化”论述,实际上是建立在一组特定的政治国家和企业之上的,领导的议程实质上进一步加强了人们对债务的广泛依赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号