首页> 外文期刊>International Planning Studies >The Merits of Merit-based Planning Appeals: Observations from Australia
【24h】

The Merits of Merit-based Planning Appeals: Observations from Australia

机译:基于优点的计划申诉的优点:来自澳大利亚的观察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A common feature of land-use planning in Australia is merit-based appeal processes where appeal bodies are granted powers to review, in most cases, local government planning decisions. In some jurisdictions these merit-based appeals are creating tension as local councils believe their role is being usurped by a review body that is neither politically elected nor democratically accountable. In the context of three case studies, this article examines the arguments for and against merit-based appeals. The conclusions of the paper are that while an appeal right of some kind is fundamental, to ensure that planning powers are not exercised inappropriately or arbitrarily, the scope of this right could be reviewed. The article argues that one option to resolve these dilemmas would be to narrow appeal rights to somewhere between judicial review and a merit-based appeal.
机译:澳大利亚土地使用规划的一个共同特征是基于绩效的上诉程序,在该程序中,上诉机构被授予审查大多数地方政府计划决策的权力。在某些司法管辖区中,这些基于绩效的呼吁正在引起紧张局势,因为地方议会认为,他们的角色正受到既未在政治上选出,也未在民主上负责的审查机构所篡夺。在三个案例研究的背景下,本文探讨了基于优点的申诉的论点。本文的结论是,尽管某种上诉权是基本的,但要确保不以不适当或任意的方式行使计划权力,可以对该权利的范围进行审查。该文章认为,解决这些难题的一种选择是将上诉权范围缩小到司法审查和基于择优上诉之间。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Planning Studies》 |2004年第4期|p.261-281|共21页
  • 作者

    STEPHEN WILLEY;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of BEAD, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U 1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:27:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号