首页> 外文期刊>International marketing review >Comparative, cross-cultural,and cross-national research A comment on good and bad practice
【24h】

Comparative, cross-cultural,and cross-national research A comment on good and bad practice

机译:比较研究,跨文化研究和跨国研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The paper seeks to provide guidance for those who have data from multiple countries and are considering writing a comparative or cross-culturalational research paper. Design/methodology/approach - The approach taken is an essay format. Findings - International comparative marketing research studies are often rejected from the International Marketing Review because authors develop theory for which they have inappropriate data. Research limitations/implications - Research models need to be commensurate with the data available. Models that claim to assess how nation-level variables of interest differentially drive beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors across countries, and yet only test the models using samples from two or three countries are not appropriate. Appropriate solutions for researchers seeking to undertake international comparative research are suggested.rnOriginality/value - The paper provides researchers with insights into successful strategies for publishing international comparative research.
机译:目的-本文旨在为那些拥有来自多个国家的数据并正在考虑撰写比较性或跨文化/国家研究论文的人提供指导。设计/方法/方法-所采用的方法是论文格式。调查结果-国际比较营销研究经常被《国际市场评论》拒绝,因为作者开发的理论不适合其数据。研究局限/含义-研究模型必须与可用数据相称。声称评估国家级利益变量如何差异驱动各国的信仰,态度和行为的模型,但是仅使用来自两个或三个国家的样本进行测试是不合适的。建议为寻求进行国际比较研究的研究人员提供适当的解决方案。原创性/价值-本文为研究人员提供了发表国际比较研究成功策略的见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号