首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of urban and regional research >MAKING VIOLENCE PUBLIC: Spatializing (Counter)publicness through the 1993 Sivas Arson Attack, Turkey
【24h】

MAKING VIOLENCE PUBLIC: Spatializing (Counter)publicness through the 1993 Sivas Arson Attack, Turkey

机译:暴力行为的公开化:通过1993年Sivas纵火袭击,土耳其扩大(反)公共性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article discusses the relationship between violence and public space in light of a collectively perpetrated and widely televised arson attack that took place in 1993 in Sivas, Turkey, and its recent on-site commemorations. It draws on critical theoretical perspectives developed since the 1990s to consider conventional models of public space as entangled in violence, while also aiming to contribute to contemporary scholarship on contrarian responses to this entanglement. The tendency in this scholarship is to identify these responses as bottom-up, unscripted, performative and direct and, therefore, as diametrically opposed to those identified as top-down, scripted, rational and legislation-facing. The multifarious initiatives and interventions involving contextually shifting priorities, positions and strategies that mark the case discussed in this article call this tendency into question. Unassimilable under such binary oppositions, these initiatives and interventions have not refrained from engaging conventional models of public space while also developing and mobilizing contrarian ones. This article ultimately argues that public space is not just where violence occurs but also where its semantic disambiguation is pursued; this pursuit, which involves various forms of socio-political work, in turn defines and continually redefines the very distinction between conventional and contrarian imaginaries of public space.
机译:本文根据1993年在土耳其锡瓦斯(Sivas)发生的一起集体性和广泛电视纵火袭击事件及其最近的现场纪念活动,讨论了暴力与公共场所之间的关系。它借鉴了1990年代以来发展起来的批判性理论观点,将传统的公共空间模型视为纠缠于暴力之中,同时也旨在为当代学者对逆向对这种纠缠的反应做出贡献。该奖学金的趋势是将这些回应识别为自下而上,无脚本,执行性和直接的,因此与那些被认定为自上而下,脚本,理性和面向法律的回应截然相反。涉及本文中讨论的案例的优先事项,职位和策略因上下文而变化的多种举措和干预措施使这种趋势受到质疑。这些举措和干预措施在这种二元对立的情况下无法同化,在发展和动员逆势模式的同时,并没有限制他们参与传统的公共空间模式。本文最终指出,公共空间不仅是发生暴力的地方,而且还是追求语义消除歧义的地方。这种追求涉及各种形式的社会政治工作,从而反过来定义并不断重新定义传统和逆势公共空间假想之间的区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号