首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of urban and regional research >WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY? THE ROLE OF BOUNCERS IN POLICING THE PUBLIC SPACES OF NIGHTLIFE DISTRICTS
【24h】

WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY? THE ROLE OF BOUNCERS IN POLICING THE PUBLIC SPACES OF NIGHTLIFE DISTRICTS

机译:谁负责?凶手在维持夜生活区公共空间的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article, based on interviews with bouncers and on ethnographic observations in two nightlife districts in the centre of two Dutch cities, Utrecht and Rotterdam, shows that public–private collaboration reveals ways of controlling public space that differ from traditional ways of policing. It demonstrates that plural policing does not automatically imply greater responsibility of private actors towards public (nightlife) spaces. A history of mistrust of private security, bouncers' increasingly ambiguous working conditions and the high levels of surveillance bouncers are subject to result in bouncers rather focusing on protecting the nightclub for which they are responsible and guaranteeing their own safety within the surveillance network, than on venturing out into public spaces to ‘protect and assure visitors' safety', as is assumed in Safe Nightlife Policies.
机译:本文基于对保镖的采访以及在两个荷兰城市(乌得勒支和鹿特丹)中心的两个夜生活区的人种学观察结果,表明公私合作揭示了与传统的警务方式不同的控制公共空间的方式。它表明多元治安并不能自动暗示私人参与者对公共(夜生活)场所的更大责任。对私人安全不信任的历史,保镖的工作条件日益模糊以及监视保镖的高水平,导致保镖更加关注于保护其负责的夜总会并在监视网络内保证自身安全,而不是如“安全夜生活政策”所假设的那样,冒险进入公共场所以“保护和确保访客的安全”。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Van Liempt; Van Aalst;

  • 作者单位

    Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;

    Urban and Regional Research Centre Utrecht, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:05:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号