【24h】

Accountability for Service Compliance:A Survey

机译:服务合规性的责任:调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent years, a range of innovations in the 'service' related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality them selves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may in tend to deceive. To tackle this issue, 'accountability' has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable proper ties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability.
机译:近年来,已经见证了与“服务”相关的技术中的一系列创新,即SaaS,PaaS和IaaS。同时,面向服务的体系结构(SOA)可以无缝地组合不同的服务以形成新的服务网络。两种趋势的结合使各个组织可以克服其对计算资源的限制,并获得自己可以提供的功能的最大价值。如此庞大的组成部分的一个主要问题是验证参与实体的合规性。组合服务通常跨越多个管理域,每个管理域都有其自己的优先级。鉴于承认违法行为可能会导致处罚,因此可以想象,一个实体可能倾向于欺骗。为了解决这个问题,“问责制”已成为实现系统可信赖性的有前途的概念。最近,问责制在研究界引起了相当大的关注,并提出了许多方法。在本次调查中,作者讨论了问责制的概念和理想的适当联系,阐明了将问责制与其他相关方法区分开的要求和差异,并系统地总结和评估了各种问责制方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号