首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy >Capacity building for community-led regeneration: Facilitating or frustrating public engagement?
【24h】

Capacity building for community-led regeneration: Facilitating or frustrating public engagement?

机译:社区主导的再生能力建设:是促进还是阻碍公众参与?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of European Union Objective 1 funding on the development and formalisation of a neighbourhood-based group situated in a regeneration area in the UK. The role, function and impact of a Community Empowerment Network (CEN) (funded by the Labour Government as part of its Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy) is also examined and assessed. Design/methodology/approach – The findings of the paper are informed by a critique of the policy literature and the ways in which “leadership” roles and responsibilities are played out within neighbourhood settings. The empirical research derives from an analysis of the role and practice of CENs in England. Findings – The paper argues that the external initiatives restrict the autonomy and independence of community based groups. Furthermore, the paper makes the point that such externally driven programmes are often located within neighbourhoods with little reference to identifying the needs or priorities of residents. Research limitations/implications – There are important lessons here for policy makers and practitioners in public policy to reflect upon. The paper seeks to draw connections between the literature on community development and planning/regeneration management. These links are important to sustain and to open the discussion to a broader audience of researchers and practice managers. Practical implications – The paper raises questions concerning how local residents/groups can be facilitated into articulating their needs and exercising agency in terms of changing the decision-making/resource allocation processes. Originality/value – The paper adds to understanding the practice of empowerment networks.
机译:目的–本文的目的是研究欧盟目标1资金对位于英国再生区的基于社区的团体的发展和正规化的影响。还检查和评估了社区赋权网络(CEN)(由工党政府作为其邻里重建策略的一部分提供资金)的作用,功能和影响。设计/方法/方法–对政策文献的批评以及在社区环境中发挥“领导”作用和责任的方式对本文的发现提供了参考。实证研究源于对CEN在英国的作用和实践的分析。调查结果–该论文认为,外部倡议限制了社区团体的自治和独立性。此外,本文指出,此类外部驱动的程序通常位于社区内,很少参考确定居民的需求或优先事项。研究的局限性/意义–这里有重要的教训可供政策制定者和公共政策从业者反思。本文力图在有关社区发展和规划/再生管理的文献之间建立联系。这些链接对于维持并向更多的研究人员和实践经理开放讨论非常重要。实际意义–本文提出了有关如何在改变决策/资源分配流程方面如何促进当地居民/群体表达其需求和行使代理的问题。原创性/价值–本文增加了对赋权网络实践的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号