首页> 外文期刊>Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali >SOCIAL JUSTICE AND DIFFERENT VIEWS OF NATURAL LAW AMONG XIX CENTURY ECONOMISTS
【24h】

SOCIAL JUSTICE AND DIFFERENT VIEWS OF NATURAL LAW AMONG XIX CENTURY ECONOMISTS

机译:十九世纪经济学家中的社会正义与自然法的不同观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The notion of 'social justice' emerged in political economy debates in the XIX century. This concept was developed particularly by Walras and by Catholic social economists. While Walras found inspiration in the view of natural law expressed by Quesnay, Catholic economists based their reflections on the Neo-Thomistic (or New Scholastic) philosophical thought developed by the Jesuits. We first study the main differences in the use of this concept among economists in the second half of the XIX century. Second, we analyse the connection between the notion of social justice and the 'classical' natural law from which it was derived. Then we highlight the debate which developed around this concept between the main currents of Roman Catholic social economics and the official adoption in encyclicals Quadragesimo Anno and Divini Redemptoris. This essay concludes by examining the impact that differing definitions of rights and the law have had on economic theory.
机译:“社会正义”的概念出现在十九世纪的政治经济学辩论中。这个概念是瓦尔拉斯和天主教社会经济学家特别提出的。瓦尔拉斯(Walras)在奎斯奈(Quesnay)表达的自然法学观点中找到了灵感,而天主教经济学家的思考则基于耶稣会士提出的新托姆主义(或新学术)哲学思想。我们首先研究十九世纪下半叶经济学家在使用这一概念上的主要差异。其次,我们分析了社会正义概念与社会正义概念的“古典”自然法则之间的联系。然后,我们着重讨论围绕这一概念展开的辩论,在罗马天主教社会经济学的主要潮流和经合著者Quadragesimo Anno和Divini Redemptoris的正式采用之间进行。本文通过考察不同的权利和法律定义对经济理论的影响来得出结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号