...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of remote sensing >Definition of component effective emissivity for heterogeneous and non-isothermal surfaces and its approximate calculation
【24h】

Definition of component effective emissivity for heterogeneous and non-isothermal surfaces and its approximate calculation

机译:非均质和非等温面的组分有效发射率的定义及其近似计算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Measurement of land surface temperature faces many problems. For example, each pixel over land surface is likely to be heterogeneous and non-isothermal with both vegetation canopy and background soil, and the three-dimensional structure of canopy often makes the canopy radiation angular dependent. It is difficult to define an overall land surface temperature and emissivity at pixel scale for heterogeneous and non-isothermal surfaces. After recalling several definitions of effective emissivities, component effective emissivity is defined in this paper under the conditions of local thermal equilibrium and a constant material emissivity for surface temperature variation in the normal Earth environment. Component effective emissivities make it possible to retrieve the component temperature based on multi-directional measurements. The sum of component effective emissivities is equal to the overall effective emissivity, which can be used to inverse pixel-averaged effective temperature. Taking the continuous plant/soil system as an example, the Monte Carlo method is used to simulate the effective emissivities, and an analytical expression equation (AEE) of the effective emissivities including direct-line emission and single scattering contribution is developed. Monte Carlo simulated results show that the sum of direct-line emission and single scattering effective emissivity is close to overall effective emissivity when soil and leaf are set to 0.94 and 0.98 respectively. Then component and overall effective emissivities calculated by Monte Carlo method and AEE are compared, and their differences are analysed for different soil and leaf emissivities. It is shown that when soil and leaf emissivities are set respectively to 0.94 and 0.98, the differences are less than 0.006 within a 50° view zenith angle. When soil or leaf emissivity is set to 0.9, the difference reaches 0.025 or 0.016, which is large enough to introduce a 1 K error in land surface temperature inversion when this effective emissivity is used. The paper finally proposes that the linear relationship of difference with soil and leaf emissivity can be used to compensate the errors.
机译:陆地表面温度的测量面临许多问题。例如,土地表面上的每个像素都可能在植被冠层和背景土壤下都是异质且非等温的,并且冠层的三维结构通常使冠层辐射与角度相关。对于异质和非等温表面,很难在像素范围内定义总体陆地表面温度和发射率。在回顾了几种有效辐射率的定义之后,本文在局部热平衡和正常地球环境中表面温度变化的恒定材料辐射率的条件下,定义了组件有效辐射率。组件的有效发射率使得可以基于多方向测量来获取组件温度。组件有效发射率的总和等于总有效发射率,可用于反算像素平均有效温度。以植物/土壤连续系统为例,采用蒙特卡罗方法对有效辐射率进行仿真,建立了包括直达辐射和单散射贡献在内的有效辐射率的解析表达式(AEE)。蒙特卡罗模拟结果表明,当土壤和叶片分别设置为0.94和0.98时,直线发射和单次散射的有效发射率之和接近整体有效发射率。然后比较了通过蒙特卡罗方法和AEE计算的成分和总体有效发射率,并分析了不同土壤和叶片发射率的差异。结果表明,当土壤和叶片的发射率分别设置为0.94和0.98时,在50°观测天顶角内的差异小于0.006。当土壤或叶片的发射率设置为0.9时,差异达到0.025或0.016,当使用此有效发射率时,该差异足以在地表温度反演中引入1 K的误差。论文最后提出可以利用差异与土壤和叶片发射率的线性关系来补偿误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号