首页> 外文期刊>International journal of remote sensing >An intercomparison of in vitro chlorophyll a determinations for MERIS level 2 data validation
【24h】

An intercomparison of in vitro chlorophyll a determinations for MERIS level 2 data validation

机译:体外叶绿素a测定MERIS 2级数据的比对

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An investigation of the capability of the MERIS (Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer) validation teams to determine chlorophyll a, using the latest measuring protocols and advanced high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), spectrophotometric and fluorometric method has been performed. Two inter-comparisons, the NIVACal 1 and 2, were made in 2002 as part of the activities of the validation of the MERIS sensor onboard ENVISAT. Eleven validation teams, represented by 20 laboratories, participated in these inter-comparisons. The algal pigment, chlorophyll a, was determined by either HPLC, spectrophotometric or fluorometric methods for samples of algal cultures, for natural samples collected off the coast of Norway, and for prepared pigment extracts. For both the HPLC and spectrophotometric results systematic errors were dominating. A few laboratories showed random errors. The coefficients of variation (CV) were determined after elimination of "outliers". The occurrence of "outliers" were frequent for both intercompar-isons. The CV for the determined values of chlorophyll a for algal cultures during NIVACal 1, varied from 10 to 25% for the HPLC and from 5 to 25% for the spectrophotometric determination. The CV for the determined values of chlorophyll a in Case Ⅱ water for natural samples in NIVACal 2 varied from 10 to 16% for HPLC and from 5 to 20% for the spectrophotometric results. The spectrophotometric results were more consistent between the laboratories. The range for CV was larger for the HPLC-based on chlorophyll a index for Case Ⅰ water and ranged from 7% to 40%. An intercomparison based on prepared chlorophyll a extracts showed a CV of 8% to 15% for the HPLC and 5% for the spectrophotometric method. Since the CV for analysing the extracts was lower than for extraction and analysis of regular samples, the extraction procedures contribute significantly to the total variation. The recommendation for MERIS validation from this inter-comparison clearly show the importance of proper extraction procedures of the pigments and the use of common and agreed protocols.
机译:使用最新的测量方案和先进的高效液相色谱(HPLC),分光光度法和荧光法对MERIS(中分辨率成像光谱仪)验证小组确定叶绿素a的能力进行了研究。作为ENVISAT机载MERIS传感器验证活动的一部分,在2002年进行了两次相互比较,即NIVACal 1和NIVACal 2。由20个实验室代表的11个验证团队参加了这些比较。通过HPLC,分光光度法或荧光法确定藻类培养物样品,挪威沿海采集的天然样品以及制备的色素提取物的藻类色素叶绿素a。对于HPLC和分光光度法结果,系统误差均占主导地位。一些实验室显示出随机错误。在消除“离群值”之后确定变异系数(CV)。两个比对者都经常出现“异常值”。 NIVACal 1期间藻类培养物中叶绿素a的测定值的CV在HPLC中为10%到25%,在分光光度法测定中为5%到25%。对于NIVACal 2中的自然样品,案例Ⅱ中的叶绿素a测定值的CV在HPLC中为10%至16%,在分光光度法结果中为5%至20%。各实验室之间的分光光度测定结果更加一致。对于案例Ⅰ水,基于叶绿素a指数的HPLC的CV范围较大,范围为7%至40%。基于制备的叶绿素a提取物的比较表明,HPLC的CV为8%到15%,分光光度法的CV为5%。由于用于分析提取物的CV低于用于常规样品的提取和分析的CV,因此提取程序对总变化有很大贡献。从这种相互比较中对MERIS进行验证的建议清楚地表明了正确提取颜料的程序以及使用通用和公认的协议的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号