...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of remote sensing >Intercomparisons of cloud-top and cloud-base heights from ground-based Lidar, CloudSat and CALIPSO measurements
【24h】

Intercomparisons of cloud-top and cloud-base heights from ground-based Lidar, CloudSat and CALIPSO measurements

机译:来自地面激光雷达,CloudSat和CALIPSO测量的云顶高度和云底高度之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study presents results of the intercomparison of cloud-top height (CTH) and cloud-bottom height (CBH) obtained from a space-borne active sensor Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR), the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP), the space-borne passive sensor Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and ground-based Lidar measurements. Three selected cases (one daytime and two night-time cases) involving various cloud conditions such as semi-transparent thin cirrus, opaque thick tropospheric clouds and multi-layered clouds are studied, with special attention to CBH. The space-based CALIOP provides reliable heights of thin high-altitude cirrus clouds containing small ice particles, but the 94 GHz CPR has low sensitivity to these clouds. The CTHs retrieved from the CPR and CALIOP for thick tropospheric clouds are in good agreement with each other. Discrepancies between the CPR and the CALIOP values of the CBH for thick opaque clouds arise from strong Lidar signal attenuations. In cloud-overlap conditions (i.e. multi-layered clouds are present), the CALIOP has difficulties in determining the cloud vertical structure (CVS) for thick clouds underlying thin cirrus clouds due to signal attenuations, whereas the CPR detects the CTH and CBH of both the cloud layers. This fact is also confirmed by the comparison of seasonal variations of occurrences of CBH and CTH retrieved from 1 year measurements. The CBHs derived from the CPR and ground-based Lidar are generally in good agreement with each other. Especially, comparison of CBH between the ground-based Lidar and CPR retrieved from June 2006 to October 2008 shows an excellent linear relationship (coefficient of determination, R~2 ~ 0.996).
机译:这项研究提出了从星载有源传感器云廓线雷达(CPR),正交偏振云气溶胶激光雷达(CALIOP)获得的云顶高度(CTH)与云底高度(CBH)的比较结果,星载无源传感器中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)和基于地面的激光雷达测量。研究了三个选定的案例(一天白天和两个晚上案例),这些案例涉及各种云条件,例如半透明的薄卷云,不透明的厚对流层云和多层云,尤其是CBH。基于天基的CALIOP可提供高度可靠的薄高卷云,其中包含小冰粒,但94 GHz CPR对这些云的灵敏度较低。从CPR和CALIOP中检索到的对流层厚云的CTH彼此非常吻合。对于厚的不透明云,CPR和CBH的CALIOP值之间的差异是由强烈的激光雷达信号衰减引起的。在云重叠的情况下(即存在多层云),由于信号衰减,CALIOP难以确定薄卷云下面的厚云的云垂直结构(CVS),而CPR会检测两者的CTH和CBH云层。通过比较从1年测量中获得的CBH和CTH的发生季节变化,也可以证实这一事实。 CPR和地面激光雷达衍生的CBH通常彼此非常吻合。特别是,从2006年6月至2008年10月取回的地面激光雷达与CPR的CBH进行了比较,显示出极好的线性关系(测定系数R〜2〜0.996)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International journal of remote sensing》 |2011年第4期|p.1179-1197|共19页
  • 作者单位

    School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul,South Korea;

    School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul,South Korea;

    School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul,South Korea;

    School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul,South Korea;

    Atmospheric Environment Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies,Tsukuba, Japan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号