首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Public procurement and EU tendering directives - explaining non-compliance
【24h】

Public procurement and EU tendering directives - explaining non-compliance

机译:公共采购和欧盟招标指令-解释违规情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to make a contribution to categorising explanations of non-compliance of EU tendering directives and to report on a survey study to the impact of these reasons on compliance with the directives. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review resulted in a conceptual model and related hypotheses, pointing at four potential reasons for (non-)compliance: the purchaser's familiarity with the rules, the perceived inefficiency, organisational incentives to comply, and the expected resistance and readiness of suppliers to take action in case of non-compliance. The paper uses data from a survey among 147 responding purchasing professionals of the Dutch Ministry of Defence. Findings - The empirical findings indicate that both purchaser's familiarity with the rules and organisational incentives have a positive, statistically significant impact on compliance. Nor the alleged inefficiency of the directives, nor the expected supplier resistance seem to influence the compliance with the directives. Research limitations/implications - The study is limited in its setting: measuring perceptions of purchasing professionals within the Dutch Ministry of Defence. Future research could combine perceptual data and objective, measurable data on compliance. Future research might include other samples from other public agencies, questioning other respondents than purchasers, measuring factors from other fields and disciplines such as criminology (risk of detection and sanction risks), economy (costs and benefits), public choice theory (legitimacy), sociology (peer pressure), and social psychology (personal values). Practical implications - A managerial implication of the findings of this study would be that educating and training public purchasers will be an effective tool for increasing the compliance with the directives. In addition, public agencies could try to establish incentives in order to stimulate compliance. Originality/value - Although many studies have reported on the (limited) effectiveness of the EU tendering directives, little work has been undertaken on the compliance as such, while no empirical studies have been carried out to explain the (lack of) compliance with EU directives. This paper reports on a quantitative study, explaining the (non-) compliance with the directives. The study could be of value to public policy makers, to public agencies, and to researchers in the academic world.
机译:目的-本文的目的是对不符合欧盟招标指令的解释进行分类,并就有关这些原因对指令的影响进行调查研究报告。设计/方法/方法-文献综述得出了概念模型和相关假设,指出了(不)合规的四个潜在原因:购买者对规则的熟悉程度,感知的效率低下,组织遵守的动机以及预期的抵制供应商准备在违规的情况下采取行动。本文使用了来自荷兰国防部的147名回应采购专业人士的调查数据。调查结果-实证结果表明,购买者对规则的熟悉程度和组织激励措施均对合规性产生积极的,统计学上显着的影响。所指称的指令效率低下,或者预期的供应商抵制似乎都不会影响对指令的遵守。研究的局限性/意义-该研究的局限性在于:测量荷兰国防部对采购专业人员的看法。未来的研究可以将感知数据与客观,可衡量的合规性数据结合起来。未来的研究可能包括来自其他公共机构的其他样本,质疑购买者以外的其他受访者,衡量其他领域和学科的因素,例如犯罪学(发现风险和制裁风险),经济(成本和收益),公共选择理论(合法性),社会学(同伴压力)和社会心理学(个人价值观)。实际意义-该研究结果的管理意义在于,教育和培训公共购买者将是增加对指令的合规性的有效工具。此外,公共机构可以尝试建立激励措施,以促进合规。独创性/价值-尽管许多研究报告了欧盟招标指令的(有限)有效性,但在遵从法规方面却很少开展工作,而未进行任何实证研究来解释对欧盟(缺乏)法规的遵从性指令。本文报告了一项定量研究,解释了(非)遵守指令的情况。这项研究对公共政策制定者,公共机构以及学术界的研究人员可能具有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号