首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Public Administration >Child Welfare's Iron Cage: Managing Performance in New Zealand's Child Welfare Agency
【24h】

Child Welfare's Iron Cage: Managing Performance in New Zealand's Child Welfare Agency

机译:儿童福利的铁笼:新西兰儿童福利局的绩效管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this article is to explain the performance management practice in use within one of New Zealand's public service agencies—Child, Youth and Family Services. These practices are described with reference to New Zealand's formal model of public sector management and the professional social work model understood by the majority of the agency's staff. The article draws on recent research into performance management practices in nine of New Zealand's public service agencies that included Child, Youth and Family Services. This involved a number of semi-structured interviews with managers and staff from the national, regional, and local levels of each agency together with a review of relevant documentation.It is argued that performance management practices exist on a continuum representing the “rationality of control” which extends from a regulative control model of rules and fixed targets to one that is more reliant on shared understandings, learning, and flexible targets. It is further suggested that the institutional structures underlying this continuum determines the extent to which performance management practices within individual agencies are loosely coupled with those used for purposes of external accountability.The article highlights the tension that exists in an organization that encompasses the substantive logic of “a values-based profession” (Ronnau, 200126. Ronnau , J. P. 2001 . “ Values and ethics for family-centered practice ” . In Balancing family-centered services and child well-being: Exploring issues in policy, practice theory, and research , Edited by: Walton , E. , Sandau-Beckler , P. and Mannes , M. 34 - 54 . New York : Columbia University Press . View all references) but which is bound by the formal, instrumental rationality implicit in its system of external accountability that, it has been claimed, “reduces a complex reality to something simplistic and one dimensional” (Tilbury, 200433. Tilbury , C. 2004 . The influence of performance measurement on child welfare policy and practice . British Journal of Social Work , 34 : 225 - 241 . [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]View all references). It, therefore, argues that the formal model of performance measurement and management of the public service should encompass the broader information and rationality used by managers within public service agencies.View full textDownload full textKeywordspublic service, performance management, child welfare, rationalityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.616010
机译:本文的目的是解释新西兰的公共服务机构之一“儿童,青年和家庭服务”中使用的绩效管理做法。这些做法是参照新西兰公共部门管理的正式模式和该机构大多数员工所理解的专业社会工作模式来描述的。本文借鉴了包括儿童,青年和家庭服务在内的九个新西兰公共服务机构对绩效管理实践的最新研究。这涉及到对每个机构的国家,地区和地方各级经理和员工进行的一些半结构化访谈,以及对相关文档的审查。有人认为绩效管理实践存在于代表“理性”的连续性上控制的范围从规则和固定目标的规则控制模型扩展到更依赖于共享的理解,学习和灵活的目标的控制模型。进一步建议,该连续性基础的制度结构决定了各个机构内绩效管理实践与用于外部问责制的松散耦合的程度。本文强调了组织内部存在的紧张关系,其中包含了“基于价值观的职业”(Ronnau,200126。Ronnau,JP2001。)“以家庭为中心的实践的价值观和道德规范”。在平衡以家庭为中心的服务和儿童福祉方面:探讨以下问题政策,实践理论和研究,编辑者:沃尔顿(E. Walton),桑多·贝克勒(Sandau-Beckler)和曼恩(M.)34-54。纽约:哥伦比亚大学出版社。查看所有参考文献),但受形式,有人声称,它在外部问责制中所隐含的工具理性“将复杂的现实简化为简单的一维事物”(Tilbury,200433。Tilbury,C.2004。儿童福利政策和实践绩效评估。英国社会工作杂志,34:225-241。 [CrossRef],[Web of Science®]查看所有参考)。因此,它认为,公共服务绩效评估和管理的正式模型应该包含公共服务机构中管理人员使用的更广泛的信息和合理性。查看全文下载全文关键词公共服务,绩效管理,儿童福利,合理性相关var addthis_config = “添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.616010

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号