首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Psychoanalysis >The definition and assessment of analytic process: can analysts agree?
【24h】

The definition and assessment of analytic process: can analysts agree?

机译:分析过程的定义和评估:分析师可以同意吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although analytic process (AP) is a core concept in psychoanalytic theory and practice and has emerged as an important variable in outcome studies, there is no consensus re- garding its definition and operationalisation. This paper describes the development and validation of the Columbia Analytic Process Scale (CAPS), a rating scale developed to evaluate the presence or absence of AP in single psychoanalytic session transcript for purposes of an outcome study. Definitions of interrater reliability and construct validity are reviewed and two studies designed to evaluate these important aspects of the CAPS are presented.
机译:尽管分析过程(AP)是精神分析理论和实践中的核心概念,并且已成为结果研究中的重要变量,但关于其定义和可操作性尚无共识。本文介绍了哥伦比亚分析过程量表(CAPS)的开发和验证,该评估量表旨在评估单个心理分析会话笔录中是否存在AP,以进行结果研究。审查了间信度和构造效度的定义,并提出了两项​​旨在评估CAPS重要方面的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号