首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Project Management >Programme management: a critical review
【24h】

Programme management: a critical review

机译:计划管理:严格审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is an increasing recognition that programme management provides a means to bridge the gap between project delivery and organisational strategy. Significant tensions tend to arise across this gap, however, between the inward-focused and task-oriented view of projects and strategy-focused and often emergent wider organisational view. It is argued within this paper that standard programme management approaches actually exacerbate these tensions. Through a critical review of standard programme management approaches, a number of issues are highlighted that concern (a) an excessive control focus, (b) insufficient flexibility in the context of an evolving business strategy, (c) ineffective co-operation between projects within the programme. These issues are traced back to the two flawed assumptions underlying programme management; namely that (a) programme management is in effect a scaled-up version of project management and (b) a 'one size fits all' approach to programme management is appropriate. In combination these observations are used to provide grounding for a fundamentally different approach to programme management designed for flexibility, enabled for adaptability in a changing business environment and focused throughout on the effective management of key stakeholder relationships.
机译:人们越来越认识到,计划管理提供了一种弥合项目交付与组织战略之间差距的方法。但是,在以内向型和面向任务的项目视图与以战略为中心的,常常出现的更广泛的组织观点之间,往往会出现巨大的紧张关系。本文认为标准程序管理方法实际上加剧了这些紧张关系。通过对标准计划管理方法的严格审查,强调了许多问题,这些问题涉及:(a)过多的控制重点;(b)在不断发展的业务战略中灵活性不足;(c)各个项目内部的无效合作该程序。这些问题可以追溯到程序管理的两个错误假设。即(a)程序管理实际上是项目管理的放大版本,并且(b)程序管理采用“千篇一律”的方法是合适的。这些观察结果结合在一起使用,为基于灵活性的计划管理提供了根本不同的方法,为适应变化的业务环境提供了适应性,并且始终侧重于关键利益相关者关系的有效管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号