首页> 外文期刊>International journal of productivity and quality management >Virtual or vertical? Achieving integrated global supply chains: comparison and analysis of virtual integration and vertical integration in Japanese and Korean steel industry
【24h】

Virtual or vertical? Achieving integrated global supply chains: comparison and analysis of virtual integration and vertical integration in Japanese and Korean steel industry

机译:是虚拟的还是垂直的?实现全球整合供应链:日韩钢铁业虚拟整合和纵向整合的比较和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Supply chain management strategies such as push strategy, pull strategy and push-pull strategy have been discussed and their advantages and disadvantages also have been empirically investigated in a number of industries in supply chain management literature. However, general assumption has been that one business entity implements supply chain strategies, even though there can be different strategies applicable for different points in supply chain timeline. This paper expands the framework of push-pull supply chain with ownership patterns. Through case studies on steel industry, we suggest that after push-pull boundary, service becomes critical competitiveness factor, and at this point, a firm can have a choice on vertical integration or not. The purpose of this paper is expanding and re-interpreting traditional supply chain strategies focusing on pull-pull boundary strategy and its ownership patterns through comparative case studies between Japanese and Korean steel processing centres.
机译:在供应链管理文献中,已经讨论了诸如推策略,拉策略和推拉策略等供应链管理策略,并在许多行业中对它们的优缺点进行了实证研究。但是,一般的假设是,一个业务实体可以实施供应链策略,即使在供应链时间轴上的不同点可以应用不同的策略。本文扩展了所有权模式下的推拉式供应链框架。通过对钢铁行业的案例研究,我们认为,在推挽式界限之后,服务成为关键的竞争力因素,在这一点上,企业可以选择是否进行纵向整合。本文的目的是通过日韩钢铁加工中心之间的比较案例研究,扩展和重新解释侧重于拉-拉边界战略及其所有权模式的传统供应链战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号