首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Keep it or give back? Optimal pricing strategy of reward-based crowdfunding with a hybrid mechanism in the sharing economy
【24h】

Keep it or give back? Optimal pricing strategy of reward-based crowdfunding with a hybrid mechanism in the sharing economy

机译:保持还是回馈?基于奖励的杂交机制与共享经济中的杂交机制的最优定价策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reward-based crowdfunding is a new fund-raising method in sharing economy, and it can also be a powerful tool for companies to handle the time mismatch between money invested and revenue generated in Circular Economy (CE). While all-or-nothing (AON) mechanism and keep-it-all (KIA) mechanism are both used in crowdfunding projects, some websites start using a new hybrid mechanism where the creator can keep a proportion of the funds raised even if the crowdfunding project fails. In this paper, we investigate this hybrid mechanism in reward-based crowdfunding projects. For a basic two-stage model, we find that AON can provide the creator with the largest expected revenue under different pricing policies when the valuation of investors is discrete. However, with continuous investors' valuation, a hybrid mechanism is better for the creator, and the price in the first stage should be lower than the one in the second stage. For a three-stage model, we find that the results with continuous valuation still hold, and a hybrid mechanism will be the optimal mechanism under menu pricing with discrete valuation.
机译:基于奖励的众筹是共享经济的新筹资方法,它也可以是公司处理资金之间的数量不匹配的强大工具,并在循环经济中产生的收入(CE)。虽然全部或全文(AON)机制和持久 - 所有(起亚)机制都用于众筹项目,但一些网站开始使用新的混合机制,即使众筹,创造者也可以保持一定比例的资金筹集项目失败。在本文中,我们调查了基于奖励的众筹项目的混合机制。对于一个基本的两阶段模型,我们发现AON可以在投资者的估值是离散的情况下,在不同定价政策下提供了在不同定价政策下的最大预期收入。然而,随着持续投资者的估值,杂交机制对创造者更好,而第一阶段的价格应该低于第二阶段中的价格。对于三级模型,我们发现具有连续估值的结果仍然存在,并且混合机制将是菜单定价下的最佳机制,采用离散估值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号