...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >A comparison of picking, storage, and routing policies in manual order picking
【24h】

A comparison of picking, storage, and routing policies in manual order picking

机译:手动订单拣配中的拣配,存储和路由策略比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the effect of three process decisions (picking, storage, and routing) on order picker travel, which is a major cost component of order fulfillment. The authors use a simulation model based on the operations of a distribution center that is currently picking one order at a time, storing product in a haphazard or random fashion, and using a simplistic procedure for routing pickers. Several picking, storage, and routing policies are evaluated to determine which process decision provides the greatest percent savings relative to the current baseline policies. Several sensitivity analyses are completed to examine the effect of order size, warehouse shape, location of pick-up/drop-off point, and demand distribution on performance. Results show that batching of orders yield the greatest savings particularly when smaller order sizes are common. Results also show the use of either a class-based or volume-based storage policy provides nearly the same level of savings as batching, while being less sensitive to the average order size.
机译:本文研究了三个流程决策(拣货,存储和工艺路线)对订单拣选机行程的影响,这是订单履行的主要成本组成部分。作者使用的仿真模型基于配送中心的运作,该配送中心目前一次要拣选一个订单,以随机或随机方式存储产品,并使用简单的过程来安排拣选人员。评估几种拣货,存储和路由策略,以确定相对于当前基准策略,哪个流程决策可以最大程度地节省成本。完成了几项敏感性分析,以检查订单大小,仓库形状,提货/落货点的位置以及需求分配对性能的影响。结果表明,批量订购可以最大程度地节省成本,特别是在较小的订货量很常见的情况下。结果还显示,使用基于类的存储策略或基于卷的存储策略,可以节省几乎与批处理相同的级别,同时对平均订单大小不那么敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号