首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >Demand-side reactive strategies for supply disruptions in a multiple-product system
【24h】

Demand-side reactive strategies for supply disruptions in a multiple-product system

机译:多产品系统中需求中断的需求方反应策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research examines demand-side reactive strategies for supply disruption in a multiple assemble to-order system. We consider an assemble-to-order system with two substitute products where the demand is price-sensitive and disruption-sensitive. Two different supply disruption situations are examined: disruption of the low-value component and disruption of the high-value component. We propose and compare the performance of four reactive strategies for managing supply disruptions, namely, the backordering strategy, the upgrading/downgrading strategy, the compensation strategy, and the mixed strategy. We find that the compensation strategy and the mixed strategy can keep more customers than the backordering strategy and the upgrading strategy during the supply disruption of the low-value product. For the disruption of the high-value product, the total number of customers keeps constant. But it does lead to the reallocation of customers among the products. We find that the mixed strategy is the best reactive strategy and the backordering strategy is the worst one among the four reactive strategies.
机译:这项研究考察了多方组装订单系统中需求中断的供应中断策略。我们考虑具有两种替代产品的按订单组装系统,其中需求对价格敏感,对干扰敏感。研究了两种不同的供应中断情况:低价值部分的中断和高价值部分的中断。我们提出并比较了四种用于管理供应中断的被动策略的绩效,即补货策略,升级/降级策略,补偿策略和混合策略。我们发现,在低价值产品供应中断期间,补偿策略和混合策略可以比回购策略和升级策略保留更多的客户。对于高价值产品的破坏,客户总数保持不变。但这确实导致了客户在产品之间的重新分配。我们发现,混合策略是最佳的被动策略,补货策略是四种被动策略中最差的一种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号