...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >The role of revenue sharing and first-mover advantage in emission abatement with carbon tax and consumer environmental awareness
【24h】

The role of revenue sharing and first-mover advantage in emission abatement with carbon tax and consumer environmental awareness

机译:通过碳税和消费者环保意识,收益共享和先发优势在减排中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study, we explore the role of revenue sharing and first-mover advantage in manufacturer's carbon emission abatement effort and the firms' profitability in a linear demand setting, where the government might impose some carbon emission charges and consumers may have environmental awareness. We consider a supply chain system, consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Either of them can move first to offer the other firm a wholesale price contract (WP) or a revenue sharing contract (RS), which is termed as "abatement level promise strategy" (PR) and "abatement level requirement strategy" (RQ), respectively. Our analysis shows that under both PR and RQ, there exists a unique abatement level maximizing the manufacturer's profit in WP and RS, respectively. Moreover, both firms' incentives for abatement are perfectly aligned under PR, but are misaligned under RQ when the marginal abatement cost is large. Contrary to conventional wisdom, RS does not necessarily dull the manufacturer's effort in abatement, it depends on whether she possesses first-mover advantage and whether consumers have environmental awareness. Further, with consumer environmental awareness (numerically) or without, both firms always prefer to possess first-mover advantage, but the system's profit under RQ is smaller than that under PR (numerically). Surprisingly, whether a greater share of revenue benefits a firm depending on whether the firm possesses first-mover advantage (numerically). Finally, under both RQ (numerically) and PR, RS fails to coordinate the system.
机译:在这项研究中,我们探讨了收益共享和先发优势在制造商的碳减排努力中的作用以及线性需求背景下的企业获利能力,在线性需求背景下,政府可能会征收一定的碳排放费,而消费者可能具有环保意识。我们考虑一个由制造商和零售商组成的供应链系统。他们中的任何一个都可以先向另一家公司提供批发价格合同(WP)或收益共享合同(RS),这被称为“减排水平承诺策略”(PR)和“减排水平需求策略”(RQ) , 分别。我们的分析表明,在PR和RQ两种情况下,都有一个独特的减排水平,分别使制造商的WP和RS利润最大化。此外,两家公司的减排动机在PR下完全一致,但在边际减排成本较大时,在RQ下却没有达成一致。与传统观点相反,RS并不一定会使制造商的减排努力变慢,这取决于她是否拥有先发优势,以及消费者是否具有环保意识。此外,无论是否有消费者环保意识,两家公司总是更喜欢拥有先发优势,但是RQ下的系统利润要比PR下的系统利润要小。令人惊讶的是,更多的收入份额是否使一家公司受益,这取决于该公司是否拥有(先发优势)先发优势。最后,在RQ(数字方式)和PR下,RS都无法协调系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号