...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >Interaction of after-sales service provider and contract type in a supply chain
【24h】

Interaction of after-sales service provider and contract type in a supply chain

机译:售后服务提供商与供应链中合同类型的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates the interaction of provider of free after-sales service and contract type of either wholesale price contracts or consignment contracts with revenue sharing in a two-echelon supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer facing random demand. We find that both firms' preferences towards the paradigms (defined as the combination of provider and contract type) are almost reverse, and each firm always prefers itself to provide after-sale service irrespective of the contract type, while the retailer always prefers a revenue sharing contract. The equilibrium paradigms depend only on whom provides after-sales service and on whom chooses a contract type, irrespective of firm powers in the supply chain and of whether demand is random or not. Moreover, compared to deterministic demand, randomness in demand results in a higher retail price and after-sales service level, less ordering quantity, and smaller profits for both firms and the chain. Finally, we apply our findings to interpret practices of several firms and make suggestions.
机译:本文研究了免费售后服务的提供商与批发价格合同或寄售合同的合同类型之间的相互作用,其中该合同具有两级供应链中的收益共享,其中一个制造商和一个零售商面临随机需求。我们发现两家公司对范式(定义为提供者和合同类型的组合)的偏好几乎是相反的,并且每个公司总是更喜欢自己提供售后服务,而不论合同类型如何,而零售商总是更喜欢收入共享合同。均衡范式仅取决于谁提供售后服务以及谁选择合同类型,而与供应链中的公司实力以及需求是否随机无关。而且,与确定性需求相比,需求的随机性会导致更高的零售价格和售后服务水平,更少的订购数量以及企业和连锁店的利润都减少。最后,我们将我们的发现应用于解释多家公司的做法并提出建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号