首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket
【24h】

On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket

机译:动态垄断中研发组合的不稳定性。或者,一个篮子里不能两个鸡蛋

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Firms' innovation portfolios include several dimensions ranging from organizational aspects to cost reduction and product characteristics. All of these efforts take place during the product life cycle, and interact with each other in determining the spectrum of features of the product and its performance on the market. This paper contributes to the related theoretical debate, focussing on the possibility of having superior product quality levels at lower marginal production cost over time. To deal with this issue, we investigate the optimal R&D portfolio of a single product monopolist investing in cost-reducing activities accompanied by efforts improving the quality of its product over an infinite time horizon. It turns out that the firm's relative incentives along the two directions are conditional upon market affluence, measured by consumers' willingness to pay for quality, and R&D efforts are complements in the neighbourhood of the steady state equilibrium. However, the dynamics of the two R&D controls depend on both quality and marginal cost at every instant. Consequently, as the stability analysis reveals, the steady state equilibrium is indeed unstable due to the dynamics of marginal cost, thereby implying that one should not expect the firm to supply an increasing quality level at a decreasing production cost. Hence, the dynamic interplay between R&D controls and the resulting instability affecting production costs also imply that one may not expect to observe product quality to increase and market price to decrease over the product life cycle.
机译:公司的创新组合包括从组织方面到降低成本和产品特性的多个方面。所有这些努力都是在产品生命周期中进行的,并且在确定产品功能范围及其在市场上的性能时相互影响。本文为相关的理论辩论做出了贡献,着眼于随着时间的推移以较低的边际生产成本获得更高的产品质量水平的可能性。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了单一产品垄断企业的最佳研发组合,该企业投资于降低成本的活动,并在无限的时间范围内努力提高其产品的质量。事实证明,企业在两个方向上的相对激励是由市场富裕度决定的,而富裕度是由消费者支付质量的意愿来衡量的,而研发努力是稳态均衡附近的补充。但是,这两个研发控制的动态取决于质量和边际成本。因此,正如稳定性分析所揭示的,由于边际成本的动态变化,稳态均衡的确是不稳定的,这意味着人们不应期望企业以降低的生产成本来提供提高的质量水平。因此,研发控制之间的动态相互作用以及由此产生的影响生产成本的不稳定性也意味着人们可能不会期望在产品生命周期中观察到产品质量提高而市场价格降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号