...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >How to price 3D-printed products? Pricing strategy for 3D printing platforms
【24h】

How to price 3D-printed products? Pricing strategy for 3D printing platforms

机译:如何价格3D印刷产品? 3D打印平台定价策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

3D printing, which is synonymous with the additive manufacturing is gaining popularity, which leads to emergence of 3D printing platforms. The pricing strategies for such platforms are quite complicated, since different kinds of products/services could be provided on the same platform at the same time. We explore the optimal pricing strategy for a 3D printing platform that sells standard and customized products, taking products' differentiation into account, where the platform and designer seek to maximize their profits, while the customer wishes to maximize their utility gained from the product purchase. In the basic model, we derive the platform's optimal prices when the platform allows the designer to add a mark-up for the standard product. We find that the standard product's final price increases with its own quality and decreases with the customized product's quality. When labour cost is low, the customized product's final price increases with its own quality and decreases with the standard product's quality. We also find that the designer's optimal mark-up for the standard product increases with the printing cost of the standard product and quality of the customized product, and decreases with the interaction cost, printing cost of the customized product, and quality of the standard product. We compare the platform's profit in the case of "partial pricing power", in which the platform allows the designer to add a mark-up, with that in the case of "full pricing power", in which the platform sets the final price of the standard product and charges a commission fee as its revenue. We find that if the difference in the quality between the standard and customized products is high, then the strategy of charging a commission fee at a rate of more than 25% is more profitable than the strategy of allowing the designer to add a mark-up to the reservation price.
机译:3D打印,即添加剂制造的代名词是越来越受欢迎,这导致3D打印平台的出现。此类平台的定价策略非常复杂,因为可以同时在同一平台上提供不同类型的产品/服务。我们探讨了销售标准和定制产品的3D打印平台的最佳定价策略,考虑到账户的产品的分化,其中平台和设计师寻求最大限度地提高其利润,而客户希望最大限度地从产品购买中获得其实用程序。在基本模式中,我们推导了平台允许设计人员为标准产品添加标记时的平台的最佳价格。我们发现标准产品的最终价格随着自己的质量而增加,并随着定制的产品质量而降低。当劳动力成本低时,定制产品的最终价格随着自己的质量而增加,并随标准产品的质量下降。我们还发现,设计师的最佳标记为标准产品随着标准产品的印刷成本和定制产品的质量而增加,并随着相互作用成本,定制产品的印刷成本以及标准产品的质量而降低。我们将平台的利润与“部分定价能力”进行比较,其中平台允许设计师添加标记,在“完整定价电源”的情况下,平台设置最终价格标准产品并为其收入收取佣金。我们发现,如果标准和定制产品之间的质量差异很高,那么以超过25%的速度计费佣金费的策略比允许设计师添加标记的策略更有利可图预订价格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号