...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of operations & production management >Productivity of product design and engineering processes: Unexplored territory for production management techniques?
【24h】

Productivity of product design and engineering processes: Unexplored territory for production management techniques?

机译:产品设计和工程流程的生产率:生产管理技术的未开发领域?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - Maintaining and improving productivity of product design and engineering processes has been a paramount challenge for design-driven companies, which are characterised a high degree of development of products and processes in order to meet particular customer requirements. Literature on this issue is fragmented and dispersed and a concise and systematic overview is lacking. Hence, it remains unclear, which methods are applicable for design-driven companies to improve the productivity of limitedly available engineering resources (a challenge companies and nations face currently). The purpose of this paper is to develop such a systematic overview. Design/methodology/approach - An unusual approach was utilised by combining the outcomes from a systematic literature review and the results of a Delphi study. From both research approaches complementary and overlapping methods for improving the productivity of product design and engineering processes could be drawn. Findings - The unique systematic overview presents 27 methods to increase the productivity, effectiveness and efficiency of product design and engineering processes of design-driven companies. Moreover, the study finds that methods for improving effectiveness are preferred over methods for improving efficiency and that limitations with regard to the availability of resources are often not considered. Research limitations/implications - During the development of the systematic overview, a lack of empirical evidence to assess the actual impact of productivity improvement methods was discovered. This shortcoming demonstrates the need for more conceptual and empirical work in this domain. More studies are needed to test and confirm the usefulness of the proposed methods. Practical implications - Nevertheless, design-driven companies, which struggle to increase the productivity of their product design and engineering processes, can systematically select improvement methods from the overview according to their impact on productivity, effectiveness and efficiency. However, companies should keep in mind, whether effectiveness of product design and engineering can really be increased without considering limitations in engineering resources. Originality/value - Therefore, the systematic overview provides a valuable map of the unexplored territory of productivity improvement methods for product design and engineering for both practitioners and researchers. For the latter ones, it creates directions for empirical investigations in order to explore and to compare methods for the improvement of productivity of product design and engineering processes.
机译:目的-维持和提高产品设计和工程流程的生产率一直是设计驱动型公司面临的最严峻挑战,而设计驱动型公司的特点是为了满足特定客户要求而高度开发产品和流程。关于这个问题的文献零散分散,缺乏简明而系统的概述。因此,目前尚不清楚,哪种方法适用于设计驱动的公司,以提高有限的可用工程资源的生产率(公司和国家当前面临的挑战)。本文的目的是开发这样的系统概述。设计/方法/方法-通过结合系统文献综述的结果和Delphi研究的结果,采用了一种不寻常的方法。从这两种研究方法中,可以得出互补和重叠的方法来提高产品设计和工程过程的生产率。调查结果-独特的系统概述提供了27种方法来提高设计驱动型公司的产品设计和工程流程的生产率,有效性和效率。此外,研究发现,提高效率的方法比提高效率的方法更可取,并且通常不考虑资源可用性方面的限制。研究的局限性/意义-在系统概述的开发过程中,发现缺乏经验证据来评估生产率提高方法的实际影响。这个缺点表明在这一领域需要更多的概念和经验工作。需要更多的研究来测试和确认所提出方法的有效性。实际意义-尽管如此,设计驱动型公司努力提高其产品设计和工程流程的生产率,可以根据其对生产率,有效性和效率的影响,从概述中系统地选择改进方法。但是,公司应该记住,是否可以在不考虑工程资源限制的情况下真正提高产品设计和工程的效率。原创性/价值-因此,系统的概述为从业人员和研究人员提供了用于产品设计和工程的生产力改进方法的未探索领域的宝贵地图。对于后者,它为实证研究创造了方向,以便探索和比较提高产品设计和工程流程生产率的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号