首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering >A Comparative Study on the Nonlinear Interaction Between a Focusing Wave and Cylinder Using State-of-the-art Solvers: Part B
【24h】

A Comparative Study on the Nonlinear Interaction Between a Focusing Wave and Cylinder Using State-of-the-art Solvers: Part B

机译:使用最先进的求解器的聚焦波和气缸非线性相互作用的比较研究:B部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, the comparative study carried out for focused wave interaction with a moving cylinder in ISOPE-2020 is reported. The fixed cylinder cases are reported in the companion paper as Part A (Sriram, Agarwal, Yan et al., 2021). The paper discusses qualitative and quantitative comparison between four different numerical solvers that participated in this comparative study. This is a challenging problem, as the cylinder moves over 40 m and interacts with the focusing waves. The performance of various solvers is compared for two different moving cylinder speeds. Both weakly coupled models and full Navier-Stokes (NS) solvers with different strategies for modeling the cylinder motion were adopted by the participants. In particular, different methods available for numerically simulating the forward speed problem emerge from this paper. The qualitative comparison based on the wave probe and pressure probe time histories between laminar and turbulent solvers is presented. Furthermore, the quantitative error analysis for individual solvers shows deviations up to 30% for moving wave probes and 50% for pressure time history. The reliability of each method is discussed based on all the wave probe and pressure probe discrepancies against experiments. The deviations for higher speed shown by all solvers indicate that further improvements in the modeling capabilities are required.
机译:本文报道,报道了在ISOPE-2020中与移动缸的聚焦波相互作用进行的对比研究。固定气缸壳体在伴侣纸上报告为A部分(Sriram,Agarwal,Yan等,2021)。本文讨论了参与该比较研究的四种不同数值溶剂之间的定性和定量比较。这是一个具有挑战性的问题,因为圆筒在40米上移动并与聚焦波相互作用。将各种溶剂的性能进行比较两种不同的移动气缸速度。参与者采用了具有不同策略的弱耦合模型和全Navier-Stokes(NS)求解器,参与者采用了不同的模拟汽缸运动的策略。特别地,从本文中出现了数字地模拟前向速度问题的不同方法。提出了基于波浪探针和压力探针时间历史的定性比较,包括层流和湍流溶剂之间的历史。此外,各个溶剂的定量误差分析显示移动波探针的偏差高达30%,压力时间历史为50%。基于所有波浪探头和压力探测差异对实验的差异讨论了每种方法的可靠性。所有溶剂所示的更高速度的偏差表明需要进一步改进建模能力。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号