...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nuclear law >Exclusive jurisdiction vs. forum shopping in European Nuclear Liability Law
【24h】

Exclusive jurisdiction vs. forum shopping in European Nuclear Liability Law

机译:《欧洲核责任法》的专属管辖权与论坛购物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Obviously, two rather contradictory principles regarding the jurisdiction are currently in force in the European Union. On one hand, the international nuclear liability conventions clearly follow the provisions of liability channelling and concentrate all proceedings to one court. On the other hand, the Brussels I. Regulation obviously prefers to make the plaintiff possible to choose between submitting his claims to the court in the country where incident occurred and to the court in his home country. This paper aims to identify interfaces between these two contradictory principles with special attention to the possibility to enforce the judgements issued by courts of non-convention states (i.e., Austria, Ireland, and Luxembourg) in those member countries, which are contracting parties either to the Paris or to the Vienna Convention.
机译:显然,关于管辖权的两个相当矛盾的原则目前在欧洲联盟中生效。一方面,国际核赔偿公约明确遵循赔偿责任的规定,并将所有程序集中到一个法院。另一方面,《布鲁塞尔一号条例》显然希望使原告可以在向事件发生国的法院和其本国法院提出索赔之间做出选择。本文旨在确定这两个相互矛盾的原则之间的接口,并特别注意是否有可能执行非常规缔约国(即奥地利,爱尔兰和卢森堡)法院在这些成员国中的缔约当事国的判决。巴黎或维也纳公约。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号