首页> 外文期刊>International journal of management science and engineering management >Base-criterion on multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications
【24h】

Base-criterion on multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications

机译:多标准决策方法及其应用的基本标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, Base-criterion method (BCM) is proposed to solve multi-criteria decision-making problems. According to BCM, instead of executing a pairwise comparisons between all criteria or executing a pairwise comparisons between each of the best and worst criteria to other criteria, one of the criteria is chosen by the decision-maker as a base-criterion (e.g. preferential, selective) and then pairwise comparisons between base-criterion and other criteria are obtained. Then, a max-min problem is formulated and solved to determine the weight of the criteria. In this way, the pairwise comparisons to obtain weights of the criteria are fully consistent. In other ability of BCM, we find the lost pairwise comparisons by using the BCM framework so that the pairwise comparisons matrix remains consistent. To illustrate the reliability of the proposed method and evaluate its performance to determine the weights, we have used two numerical examples. The outcomes of numerical examples indicate that the BCM has high accuracy and better consistency ratio than the other multi-criteria decision-making(MCDM) methods. The cause of high consistency ratio in the BCM is the dependency of pairwise comparisons between criteria. Moreover, we have used two other numerical examples to illustrate the function of the BCM in order to find out the missing comparisons in incomplete pairwise comparison matrix. We have shown the BCM framework able to find lost comparisons in the worst terms of the incomplete pairwise comparison matrix. The outcomes of the proposed article show that BCM performance is significantly better than AHP and BWM methods with respect to the consistency ratio, and it requires fewer comparison data and has the ability to calculate missing pairwise comparisons.
机译:本文提出了基准标准方法(BCM)以解决多标准决策问题。根据BCM,而不是在所有标准之间执行成对比较或在其他标准之间的每个最佳标准之间执行一对比较,而是由决策者作为基本标准选择其中一个标准(例如优先级)(例如,选择性),然后获得基准标准和其他标准之间的成对比较。然后,制定并解决了最大敏的问题以确定标准的重量。以这种方式,重组比较以获得标准的重量是完全一致的。在BCM的其他能力中,我们通过使用BCM框架找到丢失的成对比较,使得成对比较矩阵仍然是一致的。为了说明所提出的方法的可靠性并评估其性能以确定权重,我们使用了两个数值示例。数字示例的结果表明,BCM具有高精度和更好的一致性比,而不是其他多标准决策(MCDM)方法。 BCM中高一致性比的原因是标准之间的成对比较的依赖性。此外,我们已经使用了另外两个数值示例来说明BCM的功能,以便在不完整的成对比较矩阵中找出缺失的比较。我们已经显示了BCM框架,能够以不完整的成对比较矩阵的最糟糕的术语找到丢失的比较。所提出的文章的结果表明,BCM性能比AHP和BWM方法相对于一致性比率显着优势,并且需要更少的比较数据并具有计算缺失的成对比较的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号