...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of management and decision making >Empirical research of multi-criteria decision making methods used to evaluate bids for public contracts in the Czech Republic
【24h】

Empirical research of multi-criteria decision making methods used to evaluate bids for public contracts in the Czech Republic

机译:捷克共和国用于评估公共合同投标的多标准决策方法的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Multi-criteria decision making methods are used to select the best bids for public contracts. Due to strict legal regulations, only a few methods are possible to use for public contracts. This paper analyses multi-criteria decision making methods and their suitability for public contracts. Research performed in the Czech Republic in 2013 found that contracting authorities strongly prefer to use the weighted sum approach in connection with one type of transformation for quantitative criteria. They treat all criteria with the same value functions that are convex for minimising criteria and linear for maximising. In 60% of criteria, the contracting authorities limited the bidders in admissible values of criteria or defined the reference value.
机译:多准则决策方法用于选择公共合同的最佳出价。由于严格的法律法规,公共合同只能使用几种方法。本文分析了多准则决策方法及其对公共合同的适用性。 2013年在捷克共和国进行的研究发现,订约当局强烈倾向于将加权总和方法与一种转换类型结合使用以作为定量标准。他们使用相同的值函数处理所有标准,这些函数对于最小化标准是凸的,而对于最大化则是线性的。在60%的标准中,订约当局将投标人限制在可接受的标准值中或定义了参考值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号