首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Logistics Management >An inherent differentiation and system level assessment approach to inventory management: A safety stock method comparison
【24h】

An inherent differentiation and system level assessment approach to inventory management: A safety stock method comparison

机译:库存管理的固有差异性和系统级别评估方法:安全库存方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain the effects of inherent differentiation and system level performance assessment in inventory management. This is done by comparing the performance of two common safety stock methods, by considering the methods' inherent differentiation and item group-level performance effects.Design/methodology/approach Due to the lack of analytical relationships between the two methods, the analysis is based on event-driven simulations. Data are collected from eight different case companies. Findings explain the importance of assessing safety stock performance for groups of items and not for individual items, as is common in academic studies. It explains how the methods' inherent differentiation and planning environment characteristics affect the relative performances of the two safety stock methods.Findings The study explains the importance of assessing performance of safety stock methods on a system-level, rather than on item-level measures. It explains why the demand fill-rate method has a negative impact on the performance for groups of items, while the number-of-days method has a positive impact. The study also explains how the group-level safety stock performance is affected by five demand data characteristics.Research limitations/implications The study explains the importance of assessing performance of safety stock methods on a system-level, rather than on item-level measures. It explains why the demand fill-rate method has a negative impact on the performance for groups of items, while the number-of-days method has a positive impact. The study also explains how the group-level safety stock performance is affected by five demand data characteristics.Practical implications Understanding the necessity of system level assessment of safety stock performance, how methods inherently differentiate service levels, and how demand characteristics affect methods' performance can guide the choice of safety stock methods in companies.Originality/value No research on the characteristics of the number-of-days safety stock method, any assessment of differentiation characteristics of and comparison with the demand fill-rate method, has been published. The variable inherent differentiation is also introduced and defined.
机译:目的本文的目的是解释固有差异和系统级绩效评估在库存管理中的影响。通过比较两种常用安全库存方法的性能,考虑方法的固有差异和物料组级别的性能影响来完成设计/方法/方法由于两种方法之间缺乏分析关系,因此进行了分析在事件驱动的模拟中。数据是从八个不同的案例公司收集的。研究结果解释了评估安全库存绩效的重要性,这是针对项目组而不是针对单个项目的,这在学术研究中很常见。它解释了这些方法的固有差异和计划环境特征如何影响这两种安全库存方法的相对性能。研究结果解释了评估安全库存方法在系统级别而不是在项目级别的度量上的重要性。它解释了为什么需求填充率方法对项目组的性能有负面影响,而天数方法却有正面影响。该研究还解释了五个需求数据特征如何影响组级安全库存绩效。研究局限/含义该研究解释了在系统级而非项目级评估安全库存方法绩效的重要性。它解释了为什么需求填充率方法对项目组的性能有负面影响,而天数方法却有正面影响。该研究还解释了五个需求数据特征如何影响组级安全库存绩效。实际意义理解对安全库存绩效进行系统级评估的必要性,方法固有地区分服务水平以及需求特征如何影响方法绩效原始数据/值尚未发表有关天数安全库存方法特征的研究,也没有评估其差异特征并将其与需求填充率方法进行比较的研究。还介绍并定义了变量固有的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号