...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >Environmental impact of thin-film GalnP/GaAs and multicrystalline silicon solar modules produced with solar electricity
【24h】

Environmental impact of thin-film GalnP/GaAs and multicrystalline silicon solar modules produced with solar electricity

机译:用太阳能发电的薄膜GalnP / GaAs和多晶硅太阳能组件对环境的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background, aim, and scope The environmental burden of photovoltaic (PV) solar modules is currently largely determined by the cumulative input of fossil energy used for module production. However, with an increased focus on limiting the emission of CO_2 coming from fossil fuels, it is expected that renewable resources, including photovoltaics, may well become more important in producing electricity. A comparison of the environmental impacts of PV modules in case their life cycle is based on the use of PV electricity in contrast to conventional electricity can elucidate potential environmental drawbacks in an early stage of development of a solar-based economy. The goal of this paper is to show for ten impact categories the environmental consequences ofrnreplacing fossil electricity with solar electricity into the life cycle of two types of PV modules.rnMaterials and methods Using life cycle assessment (LCA), we evaluated the environmental impacts of two types of PV modules: a thin-film GalnP/GaAs tandem module and a multicrystalline silicon (multi-Si) module. For each of the modules, the total amount of fossil electricity required in the life cycle of the module was substituted with electricity that is generated by a corresponding PV module. The environmental impacts of the modules on the midpoint level were compared with those of the same modules in case their life cycle is based on the use of conventional electricity. The environmental impacts were assessed for Western European circumstances with an annual solar irradiation of 1000 kWh/m~2. For the GalnP/GaAs module, the environmental impacts of individual production steps were also analysed.rnResults Environmental burdens decreased when PV electricity was applied in the life cycle of the two PV modules. The impact score reductions of the GalnP/GaAs module were up to a factor of 4.9 (global warming). The impact score reductions found for the multi-Si module were up to a factor of 2.5 (abiotic depletion and global warming). Reductions of the toxicity scores of both module types were smaller or negligible. This is caused by a decreased use of fossil fuels, on the one hand, and an increased consumption of materials for the production of the additional solar modules used for generating the required PV electricity on the other. Overall, the impact scores of the GalnP/GaAs module were reduced more than the corresponding scores of the multi-Si module. The contribution analysis of the GalnP/ GaAs module production steps indicated that for global warming, the cell growth process is dominant for supply with conventional electricity, while for the solar scenario, the frame becomes dominant. Regarding freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity scores associated with the life cycle of the GalnP/ GaAs module, the cell growth process is dominant for supply with conventional electricity, while the reactor system for the cell growth with the associated gas scrubbing system is dominant for the solar scenario.rnDiscussion There are uncertainties regarding the calculated environmental impact scores. This paper describes uncertainties associated with the used economic allocation method, and uncertainties because of missing life cycle inventory data. For the GalnP/GaAs module, it was found that the global warming impact scores range from -66% to +41%, and the freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity scores (for an infinite time horizon) range from -40% to +300% compared to the default estimates. For both impact categories, the choices associated with the allocation of gallium, with the electricity mix, with the conversion efficiency of the commercially produced GalnP/GaAs cells, and with the yield of the cell growth process are most influential. For freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, the uncertainty concerning the lifetime of the reactor system for the GalnP/GaAs cell growth process and the gas scrubbing system is particularly relevant.rnConclusions Use of PV electricity instead of fossil electricity significantly reduc
机译:背景,目标和范围当前,光伏(PV)太阳能电池组件的环境负担在很大程度上取决于用于组件生产的化石能源的累积输入。但是,随着人们越来越关注限制化石燃料产生的CO_2排放,人们期望包括光伏在内的可再生资源在发电方面将变得越来越重要。如果光伏组件的生命周期是基于光伏发电的,则对光伏组件的环境影响进行比较,而传统的光伏发电可以在太阳能经济发展的早期阶段阐明潜在的环境弊端。本文的目的是针对十种影响类别显示在两种类型的光伏组件的生命周期中用化石电代替太阳能发电的环境后果。材料和方法使用生命周期评估(LCA),我们评估了两种环境的影响类型的PV模块:薄膜GalnP / GaAs串联模块和多晶硅(multi-Si)模块。对于每个模块,将模块生命周期中所需的化石电总量替换为相应PV模块产生的电。如果模块的生命周期是基于常规电力的使用,则将模块在中点水平上的环境影响与相同模块的环境影响进行了比较。评估了西欧环境对环境的影响,每年的太阳辐射量为1000 kWh / m〜2。对于GalnP / GaAs模块,还分析了各个生产步骤的环境影响。rn结果当在两个PV模块的生命周期中使用PV电力时,环境负担减少了。 GalnP / GaAs模块的冲击得分降低幅度高达4.9(全球变暖)。多晶硅模块的冲击得分降低了2.5倍(非生物耗竭和全球变暖)。两种模块类型的毒性评分降低幅度较小或可忽略不计。一方面是由于减少了对化石燃料的使用,另一方面是由于增加了用于生产用于产生所需PV电的附加太阳能电池组件的材料消耗。总体而言,GalnP / GaAs模块的冲击得分比多晶硅模块的相应得分降低得更多。 GalnP / GaAs组件生产步骤的贡献分析表明,对于全球变暖而言,细胞生长过程是常规电力供应的主导,而对于太阳能而言,框架则占主导地位。关于与GalnP / GaAs组件的生命周期相关的淡水水生生态毒性得分,细胞生长过程是传统电力供应的主要来源,而细胞生长的反应器系统以及相关的气体洗涤系统在太阳能条件下是主要的。讨论关于计算出的环境影响评分,存在不确定性。本文描述了与使用的经济分配方法相关的不确定性,以及由于缺少生命周期清单数据而导致的不确定性。对于GalnP / GaAs模块,发现与之相比,全球变暖影响得分范围为-66%至+ 41%,淡水水生生态毒性得分(无限期)范围为-40%至+ 300%。默认估算值。对于这两种影响类别,与镓分配,电混合,商业生产的GalnP / GaAs细胞的转化效率以及细胞生长过程的产量相关的选择都具有最重要的影响。对于淡水水生生态毒性而言,与GalnP / GaAs细胞生长过程的反应器系统的寿命以及气体洗涤系统的不确定性尤为相关。结论结论使用PV电代替化石电可显着降低

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号