...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2)
【24h】

Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2)

机译:在可持续性科学进步的背景下进行生命周期可持续性评估(第2部分)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose In the context of progress of sustainability science, life cycle thinking and, in particular, life cycle sustainability assessment may play a crucial role. Environmental, economic and social implications of the whole supply chain of products, both goods and services, their use and waste management, i.e. their entire life cycle from "cradle to grave" have to be considered to achieve more sustainable production and consumption patterns. Progress toward sustainability requires enhancing the methodologies for integrated assessment and mainstreaming of life cycle thinking from product development to strategic policy support. Life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC) and social LCA (sLCA) already attempt to cover sustainability pillars, notwithstanding different levels of methodological development. An increasing concern on how to deal with the complexity of sustainability has promoted the development of life cycle sustainability frameworks. As a contribution to the ongoing scientific debate after the Rio+20 conference, this paper aims to present and discuss the state of the art of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), giving recommendations for its further development in line with ontological, epistemological and methodological aspects of sustainability science. Methods Building on the review about the state of the art of sustainability science and sustainability assessment methods presented in part I, this paper discuss LCA, LCC, sLCA and LCSA against ontological, epistemological and methodological aspects of ongoing scientific debate on sustainability. Strengths and weaknesses of existing life cycle-based methodologies and methods are presented. Besides, existing frameworks for LCSA are evaluated against the criteria defined in part I in order to highlight coherence with sustainability science progress and to support better integration and mainstreaming of sustainability concepts. Conclusions and outlook LCSA represents a promising approach for developing a transparent, robust and comprehensive assessment. Nevertheless, the ongoing developments should be in line with the most advanced scientific discussion on sustainability science, attempting to bridge the gaps between the current methods and methodologies for sustainability assessment. LCSA should develop so as to be hierarchically different from LCA, LCC and sLCA. It should represent the holistic approach which integrates (and not substitutes) the reductionist approach of the single part of the analysis. This implies maintaining the balance between analytical and descriptive approaches towards a goal and solution-oriented decision support methodology.
机译:目的在可持续性科学进步的背景下,生命周期思维,尤其是生命周期可持续性评估可能发挥关键作用。必须考虑整个产品,商品和服务供应链,其使用和废物管理的环境,经济和社会影响,即从“摇篮到坟墓”的整个生命周期,以实现更可持续的生产和消费方式。朝着可持续发展的方向发展,需要改进从产品开发到战略政策支持的生命周期思维综合评估和主流化方法。尽管方法论发展水平不同,生命周期评估(LCA),生命周期成本(LCC)和社会LCA(sLCA)已经尝试涵盖可持续性支柱。人们越来越关注如何应对可持续性的复杂性,从而促进了生命周期可持续性框架的发展。为了对里约+ 20会议之后正在进行的科学辩论做出贡献,本文旨在介绍和讨论生命周期可持续性评估(LCSA)的技术水平,并根据本体论,认识论和方法论为进一步发展提出建议可持续性科学的各个方面。方法在对第一部分介绍的可持续发展科学和可持续性评估方法进行回顾的基础上,本文针对正在进行的可持续性科学辩论的本体论,认识论和方法论方面,讨论了LCA,LCC,sLCA和LCSA。介绍了现有基于生命周期的方法论和方法的优缺点。此外,根据第一部分中定义的标准对LCSA的现有框架进行了评估,以强调与可持续性科学进步的一致性,并支持可持续性概念的更好整合和主流化。结论和展望LCSA是开发透明,强大而全面的评估的有前途的方法。然而,正在进行的发展应该与关于可持续性科学的最先进的科学讨论相一致,试图弥合当前的方法和可持续性评估方法之间的差距。 LCSA应该发展为在层次上不同于LCA,LCC和sLCA。它应该代表整体方法,该方法整合(而不是替代)分析单个部分的还原论方法。这意味着要在实现目标的分析方法和描述方法与面向解决方案的决策支持方法之间保持平衡。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Sustainability Assessment Unit, European Commission-Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability,Via Enrico Fermi 2749, T.P. 270,21027 Ispra, Varese, Italy;

    Interuniversity Research Centre on Sustainable Development(CIRPS)-Sapienza Universita di Roma,Piazza San Pietro in Vincoli 10,00184 Rome, Italy Department Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,Sapienza Universita di Roma,Via Eudossiana 18,00184 Rome, Italy;

    LCA and Ecodesign Laboratory, Italian National Agency LCA and Ecodesign Laboratory, Italian National Agencyfor new Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA),via Martiri di Monte Sole 4,40129 Bologna, Italy;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Life cycle sustainability assessment; Science-policy interface; Stakeholder involvement; Sustainability science; Value choices;

    机译:生命周期可持续性评估;科学政策界面;利益相关者的参与;可持续发展科学;价值选择;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号