...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment >Environmental impact and cost assessment of incineration and ethanol production as municipal solid waste management strategies
【24h】

Environmental impact and cost assessment of incineration and ethanol production as municipal solid waste management strategies

机译:焚烧和乙醇生产的环境影响和成本评估作为城市固体废物管理策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose Municipal solid waste (MSW) can be handled with several traditional management strategies, including landfilling, incineration, and recycling. Ethanol production from MSW is a novel strategy that has been proposed and researched for practical use; however, MSW ethanol plants are not widely applied in practice. Thus, this study has been conducted to analyze and compare the environmental and economic performance of incineration and ethanol production as alternatives to landfilling MSW.Methods The ISO 14040 life cycle assessment framework is employed to conduct the environmental impact assessment of three different scenarios for the two MSW management strategies based on processing 1 ton of MSW as the functional unit. The first scenario models the process of incinerating MSW and recovering energy in the form of process heat; the second scenario also includes the process of incinerating MSW but yields in the recovery of energy in the form of electricity; and the third scenario models the process of converting MSW into ethanol. The economic impacts of each scenario are then assessed by performing benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR) and net present value (NPV) analyses. Results arid discussion The results from the environmental impact assessment of each scenario reveal that scenario 2 has the highest benefits for resource availability while scenario 3 is shown to be the best alternative to avoid human health and ecosystems diversity impacts. Scenario 1 has the worst environmental performance with respect to each of these environmental endpoint indicators and has net environmental impacts. The results of the economic analysis indicate that the third scenario is the best option with respect to BCR and NPV, followed by scenarios 2 and 1, respectively. Furthermore, environmental and economic analysis results are shown to be sensitive to MSW composition.Conclusions It appears municipalities should prefer MSW incineration with electricity generation or MSW-to-ethanol conversion over MSW incineration with heat recovery as an alternative to landfilling. The contradiction between the environmental impact assessment results and economic analysis results demonstrates that the decision-making process is sensitive to a broad set of variables. Decisions for a specific MSW management system are subject to facility location and size, MSW composition, energy prices, and governmental policies.
机译:目的可以通过几种传统的管理策略来处理城市固体废物(MSW),包括填埋,焚化和回收。从城市固体废弃物生产乙醇是一种已提出并研究用于实际用途的新策略。然而,城市固体废弃物乙醇工厂在实践中并未得到广泛应用。因此,本研究旨在分析和比较焚烧和乙醇生产作为垃圾填埋场MSW的替代品的环境和经济绩效。方法采用ISO 14040生命周期评估框架对两种环境的三种不同情况进行环境影响评估基于处理1吨MSW作为功能单元的MSW管理策略。第一种方案模拟了焚烧垃圾和以过程热的形式回收能量的过程。第二种情况还包括焚化城市固体垃圾的过程,但以电的形式回收能源。第三种方案模拟了将城市固体废弃物转化为乙醇的过程​​。然后,通过执行收益成本比(BCR)和净现值(NPV)分析来评估每种情况的经济影响。结果与讨论每个方案的环境影响评估结果表明,方案2在资源可用性方面具有最大优势,而方案3被证明是避免人类健康和生态系统多样性影响的最佳选择。就每种环境端点指标而言,方案1的环境绩效最差,并且对环境产生净影响。经济分析的结果表明,就BCR和NPV而言,第三种方案是最佳选择,其次分别是方案2和1。此外,环境和经济分析结果显示出对城市生活垃圾的组成敏感。结论似乎市政当局应优先选择通过发电或将城市生活垃圾向乙醇转化的城市生活垃圾焚烧,而不是将热量回收作为垃圾填埋的城市生活垃圾焚烧。环境影响评估结果与经济分析结果之间的矛盾表明,决策过程对广泛的变量敏感。特定MSW管理系统的决定取决于设施的位置和规模,MSW组成,能源价格和政府政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号