首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Knowledge-Based in Intelligent Engineering Systems >Combination and optimization of classifiers in gender classification using genetic programming
【24h】

Combination and optimization of classifiers in gender classification using genetic programming

机译:使用遗传规划的性别分类中分类器的组合和优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we have investigated the problem of gender classification using frontal facial images. Four different classifiers, namely K-means, k-nearest neighbors, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Mahalanobis Distance Based classifiers are compared. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve along with the area under the convex hull (AUCH) have been utilized as the performance measures of the classifiers at different feature subsets. To measure the overall performance of a classifier with single scalar value, the new scheme of finding the area under the convex hull of AUCH of ROC curves (AUCH of AUCHS) is proposed. It has been observed that, when the number of macro features is increased beyond 5, the AUCH saturates and even decreases for some classifiers, illustrating the curse of dimensionality. We then used genetic programming to combine classifiers and thus evolved an optimum combined classifier (OCC), producing better performance than the individual classifiers. We found that using only two features, the OCC has comparable performance to that of original classifier using 20 macro features. It produces true positive rate values as high as 0.94 corresponding to false positive rate as low as 0.15 for 1: 3 train to testing ratio. We also observed that heterogeneous combination of classifiers is more promising than the homogenous combination.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了使用正面面部图像进行性别分类的问题。比较了四个不同的分类器,即K均值,k最近邻,线性判别分析和基于Mahalanobis距离的分类器。接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线以及凸包下的面积(AUCH)已被用作分类器在不同特征子集中的性能指标。为了测量具有单个标量值的分类器的整体性能,提出了一种新的方案,该方案寻找ROC曲线的AUCH的凸壳(AUCHS的AUCH)下的面积。已经观察到,当宏特征的数量增加到超过5个时,对于某些分类器,AUCH饱和甚至降低,这说明了维数的诅咒。然后,我们使用遗传程序设计来组合分类器,从而发展出最佳的组合分类器(OCC),其性能要优于单个分类器。我们发现,仅使用两个功能,OCC的性能可与使用20个宏功能的原始分类器相媲美。对于1:3的列车测试比率,它会产生高达0.94的真实阳性率值,而对应的虚假阳性率则低至0.15。我们还观察到分类器的异构组合比同质组合更有希望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号