Of the notorious Cambridge Ring-of-Five much has been written, with some debate about which of its members, Kim Philby, Anthony Blunt, Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, or John Cairncross, was the most interesting, or inflicted the greatest damage, but Andrew Lownie makes a good case for demonstrating that previous studies on this topic have only scraped the surface of this iconic network, Although plenty has been published about Philby and Blunt, only Tom Driberg~1 and Michael Holzman~2 had written about Burgess until 2015 when Stuart Purvis and Jeff Hulbert~3 released another biography almost simultaneously with Lownie's.
展开▼
机译：在臭名昭着的剑桥戒指中已经写了一些争论，有一些关于其哪些成员，金菲尔，安东尼·钝，Guy Burgess，Donald Maclean或John Cairncross的争论是最有趣的，或者造成最大的伤害，但安德鲁Lownie向展示了对本课题的先前研究只刮了这一主题的研究，虽然已经发表了关于Philby and Blunt的大量的，但只有汤姆Drailberg〜1和Michael Holzman〜2〜2〜2〜2〜2 2015年斯图尔特Purvis和Jeff Hulbert〜3几乎与Lownie同时发布了另一种传记。
展开▼
